From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25620 invoked by alias); 18 May 2016 16:32:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 25603 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2016 16:32:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=1161 X-HELO: mail-qk0-f174.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f174.google.com) (209.85.220.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 18 May 2016 16:32:49 +0000 Received: by mail-qk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id n62so26846949qkc.2 for ; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:32:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hTC/KmTZ9KFRhYz0HEE7DrHv71QjGMvCm9IECPsFCiw=; b=FSLTK9ad0BBiO1nqvr2QS7ozEHJCgqLA/qrXzG9fUZVFaWpHIuRxyPZFXFMUsFGEjH bLcrmHMjb0A205yJENP579hlBhf9dfM0UPjIVE+A80igKwUpjEA01DYw/pafuk2zTBM8 B3VHTdatHM1343KOvYK53yn3mBx225CZZKkxHOLpBwlh1QR6tl4/z/20XLtuYTnwFMW3 R0QnS2Lk/h9J7rU4ErzN8GkQrvn4l/mbC891RLYnw6G6aMtOghc2Lzf2UZlBFBO507L5 07CIo43I89CHCpTioQTBCe4VH0ackPpRJyg9pGmrntO0w/EhndOcHlGc6fqIa71zFdNG 1HWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUNbuXfYozylTd1g89/Zm+qo56oklp/DkhAJE5utQmK7LUrNNd16XzNoSJLBLLEpw== X-Received: by 10.55.71.66 with SMTP id u63mr9044705qka.67.1463589167289; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.21.188.188] ([62.154.173.198]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n4sm4538968qkd.21.2016.05.18.09.32.46 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 18 May 2016 09:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Building from source packages To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <9e467345-d26f-85cc-6283-81af62fd927f@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:32:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 On 13/05/2016 16:33, Jon Turney wrote: > > Recently I've done a little prototyping of a system to build from > uploaded source packages in a VM, to verify that they recreate packages > with the same contents as the uploaded packages. > > Issues I noted were: > > > * a handful of packages are oddities > > These often contain source and patches, but no build script, so the > configuration used by the maintainer to build the package isn't recorded > (at least in a way accessible to automation) > > pkg ver arch > --- --- ---- > bzr 2.6+b2-2 x86 contains source for 2.6b2-1 and 2.6+b2-2 > exim 4.86-1 both > fetchmail 6.3.21-1 x86 > flex 2.5.39-1 both orphaned > ipc-utils 1.0-1 x86 > mined 2015.25-0 x86_64 a note from maintainer pointing to x86 src > nmh 1.6-2 both uniquely, g-b-s script name doesn't end .sh > popt 1.16-1 both orphaned > suite3270 3.3.15ga9-1 both uniquely, multiple g-b-s and one tarfile flex and popt were probably built with a g-b-s like script by CGF. I had the same issue when I adopted make. popt version is last upstream, while flex had a new release last November after long time Regards Marco