On 17/06/2020 22:23, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On 17/06/2020 20:24, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>> On 17.06.2020 10:41, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>>> On 15/06/2020 19:26, Achim Gratz wrote:
>>>> Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps writes:
>>>>> Turns out just running "rebaseall" worked for me. I don't get any
>>>>> fork-related warnings/errors any more.
>>>> No it doesn't, it's a mere coincidence that it worked in your case. 
>>>> You
>>>> shouldn't manually run rebaseall on Cygwin at all in fact, setup
>>>> perpetual postinstall actions take care of maintaing the rebase map.
>>>> If you ever have reason to believe that the rebase map needs a complete
>>>> rebuild, run "rebase-trigger full" and then run setup again.
>>>>
>>>> Fitting newly built DLL into the rebase map is correctly done by an
>>>> ephemeral rebase like the script Marco has shown you does.
>>> Good to know and thanks for the script Marco, seems to work well for me.
>>>
>>> The only patch Fedora seems to be using is one to disable the bundled
>>> SIP for building (which I think we need), so I believe this is now
>>> finished. Do I need to rebuild against the new version of Python that
>>> came out a few days ago for cygwin?
>>>
>>> Hamish
>>>
>> If still work NO. If don't, we need to understand why as they should be
>> binary compatible.

Still works with the build from before, just double-checked.

Am I good to go now?

Hamish