Re: [ITA] ruby-tk 0.4.0

[Daisuke Fujimura <booleanlabel@gmail.com>]

> If you can locally build a working package, you can use 'cygport upload'
>   to upload it (and then push the update to the packaging repo with
> '--push-option=nobuild').

Thanks for the advice!

I have confirmed that ruby-tk can be packaged by updating cygport and ruby-rdoc.

- https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4889008372
  - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4889008372/jobs/8727225513#step:6:223
(Bin dir is correct)
  - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4889008372/jobs/8727225513#step:6:1722
(ERROR not found)


On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:22 AM Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On 02/05/2023 10:31, Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >> Is this error expected?
> >
> > Sorry, I missed that.
> >
> > This seems to be caused by rdoc-6.1.2 not working with ruby-3.x.
> >
> > - https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2019/12/12/separation-of-positional-and-keyword-arguments-in-ruby-3-0/
> >
> > Therefore, it is necessary to update rdoc first, but packaging
> > rdoc-6.5.0 also fails for the same reason, so it needs to be updated
> > by other means besides scallywag:
>
> If you can locally build a working package, you can use 'cygport upload'
>   to upload it (and then push the update to the packaging repo with
> '--push-option=nobuild').
>
> > - Create a package using ruby-2.6.4.
> > - Create a package using rdoc-6.5.0 installed in a different location
> > with gem install.
> >
> > Other issues have also been found.
> >
> > - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4850129175/jobs/8642826755#step:6:223
> >
> > This seems to need a fix in rubygems.cygclass, so I will send a patch.
> >
> > I will work in the following order.
> >
> > 1. Send a patch for rubygems.cygclass
> > 2. ITA ruby-rdoc
> > 3. ITA ruby-tk
>
> Thanks very much.
>