From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123631 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2016 11:59:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 123621 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2016 11:59:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=forums, Fuse, severe, mount X-HELO: mail-vk0-f66.google.com Received: from mail-vk0-f66.google.com (HELO mail-vk0-f66.google.com) (209.85.213.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:59:21 +0000 Received: by mail-vk0-f66.google.com with SMTP id x130so8855691vkc.2 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 04:59:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wTOeb8Px7f7/zgmKt0lDlHfDdd+FmqBNTVJkhmD/e38=; b=LnP/OfshaSisHnofnRwmNogsCriD6NoHeSwxiLEFeQQr/WqKW1h+5LzjXC8tWG5rej 6ag6sXTYOyp59eyxNF5+Xt69D7BUtXV8CjOvD5mYI/ybsnf6RhVnITivTnimF/YBACTh 2gXd+50m6KziE2jMZE7c+bFbLjfZDc7bo0KrVVz92XxinlqE7zO9tta0TuCF+Q9Pk7We hvEPRl2M3YUYouf0OK+CmGCinHGKQ0LupUBvTxiTxjoVUBC8lZoN1VlTNegOl7/r8CMJ 6X7r4/2JZ9Ty0nUIEiGVaqgIABgqENnbDgis0/1xF5HNtcihgGpkUVS0oeRfaA+ZSZiS kv3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuyEg5zOUsCDYlaC9D/tTEnf85h7mkmf9yVLwmFfX5hHKIyitqAvwP2eK4MPyu19eeiWxnyo0ZhkljTCA== X-Received: by 10.159.37.149 with SMTP id 21mr1385026uaf.63.1469188759420; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 04:59:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.7.68 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 04:59:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Adrien JUND Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 Hi, Here is Liryna from Dokan-dev community, our project Dokany have the same purpose of Bill project. Like WinFSP, it is able to mount FUSE filesystem on cygwin before WinFSP ex= ist. I would like to point out that naming WinFSP package "fuse" is not the good way to integrate WinFSP in cygwin. The package is not related to fuse developers or community. It would make the user believe that the package is an official fuse project and I am not sure that=E2=80=99s what Nikratio from libfuse would like. The package should be renamed winfsp-fuse for give ability of cygwin users to choose which solution they would like to use. Like dokan-fuse, cbfs-fuse and other projects that offer the same service... All these packages would install their own libfuse for link compatibility that use their own dependency. Fuse name should be kept for official port by libfuse or by a future integration directly compatible with windows kernels. The official fuse window integration is an official request made by devs on WPDEV. This request is well placed on the top so it is probably only a question of time before windows do it in the same time as the Linux subsystem integration. https://wpdev.uservoice.com/forums/266908-command-prompt-console-bash-on-ub= untu-on-windo/suggestions/13522845-add-fuse-filesystem-in-userspace-support= -in-wsl I also would like to point out that WinFSP has absolutely no feedback of any kind by users and has not been tested on all windows versions. I think Kernel drivers should at least have some feedback and known as used in production before choosing to be distributed as cygwin package. Unstable kernel drivers can create severity damage in case of BSOD like windows or user files corruption. These analyses are probably severe but for the good of cygwin users, integrate kernel driver dependence should be well thought before making the step. Thanks, Liryna, 2016-07-22 9:59 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen : > > On Jul 21 22:11, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: > > On 7/20/16, 1:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > >We just might still want to change the name to "no+body". > > > > > >What do others on this list think? What sounds better? > > > > > > "nodomain+nobody" or "no+body" > > > > Corinna, hi. > > > > I know you have asked others to chime in, but IMO you should go ahead a= nd > > change it to =E2=80=9Cno+body=E2=80=9D. > > Done. > > > I also would ask others to chime in regarding this package and > > specifically if it is one they would like to see in Cygwin. > > > > I am also unclear on what the next steps are regarding this package > > submission. Does the package need 5 votes in order to be accepted? Does= it > > only need 1 GTG vote because FUSE packages already exist on most major > > Linux distros? > > A GTG should be ok here. > > > Thanks, > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat