From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-apps-return-29229-listarch-cygwin-apps=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 25977 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2011 11:21:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 25965 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2011 11:21:18 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-iy0-f171.google.com) (209.85.210.171)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:21:01 +0000
Received: by iaen33 with SMTP id n33so673426iae.2        for <cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.147.197 with SMTP id o5mr3820557icv.54.1318936860659; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.6.65 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E94181D.1090600@gmail.com>
References: <CAH7za-Bv7D84wjExfGe_Y7oYGSwq=Q61OGjq7J3wP56i_OcwBA@mail.gmail.com>	<4E8C7F4E.3080002@cwilson.fastmail.fm>	<4E94181D.1090600@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:21:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH7za-A_SKewefyznTyqyzSxt9U0ddjy=O+T7H9fyFCMsRs8gw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1
From: Jussi Kantola <jussi.kantola@gmail.com>
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com
List-Id: <cygwin-apps.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2

Bump, if only to show that I'm serious about maintaining the package.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> +1 . Same comment about missing package procedure

Thanks for the vote.  I'm sorry but if there's still an issue about
packaging, or procedure, I need it pointed out.
AFAIK the package is OK now.

> This upstream package is not really thought for easy porting,
> it inglobes a lot of library including gsl-1.14 while should be better
> to link with cygwin gsl.

Agreed.  If this is a showstopper, I can check out if it works OK with
the stock GSL.
To the best of my knowledge astrometry.net doesn't actually change
anything in GSL, they just
omit what's not required.

+3 at the moment ...

-- 
jussi