From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14081 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2011 13:18:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 14070 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2011 13:18:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-yw0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.213.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:18:36 +0000 Received: by ywp17 with SMTP id 17so6523358ywp.2 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 05:18:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.161.69 with SMTP id s5mr46905188icx.23.1320671915272; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 05:18:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.159.197 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 05:18:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EB45567.5030500@cwilson.fastmail.fm> References: <6r0p87d36jnok922ec2mkfjqpog218994j@4ax.com> <4E8F0AA2.4060402@gmail.com> <4EB3865A.2060400@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <4EB45567.5030500@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1 From: Jussi Kantola To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: > You should probably do that, to ensure that the build procedure works on > your machine. Also, to test the resuts; I have no idea how to use this > stuff. It builds fine, and the resulting installation works fine when I put some sky catalogs in /usr/share/astrometry/data/. The question becomes, would it be better to create a separate package (astrometry.net-data-tycho or such) for the (example/test) catalogs, than to have them in the binary/source packages? Theoretically, and I suppose in eventual actuality as well, there could be many different sets of catalogs, so separate packaging sounds like the way to go ... > Provided you can rebuild this package on your machine, AND that it actually > works, consider it GTG. With the notice/question above, it worked like a charm -- and I thank you dearly! -- jussi