From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12885 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2014 08:00:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 12834 invoked by uid 89); 30 Oct 2014 08:00:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-la0-f45.google.com Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (HELO mail-la0-f45.google.com) (209.85.215.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:57:41 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id gm9so3890671lab.4 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:57:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.48.3 with SMTP id h3mr17153487lbn.71.1414655857889; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.150.147 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:57:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20141029111701.GA11402@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <87a9bvsnse.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8761loegk8.fsf_-_@Rainer.invalid> <87fvkq57do.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87y4y8uoe2.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k369lc8v.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <1408137347.1564.19.camel@YAAKOV04> <87vbpsewyw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <544FC737.9060202@cornell.edu> <20141029111701.GA11402@calimero.vinschen.de> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: perl-5.18.2-1 From: Reini Urban To: cygwin-apps , Reini Urban Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 2014-10-29 12:17 GMT+01:00 Corinna Vinschen : > On Oct 28 12:41, Ken Brown wrote: >> On 8/16/2014 3:04 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: >> >Yaakov Selkowitz writes: >> >>Thanks for the reminder. Where did we leave off wrt breaking out >> >>perl_vendor? >> > >> >I've offered a practical way to do this for everyone to test on a 32bit >> >install. If that works and is agreeable, I've also offered to ITA/ITP >> >the packages in question plus any other Perl distributions that >> >maintainers want to be taken off their hands. That's the way I've been >> >running my own installations for about two years now and I haven't been >> >looking back. This way was not practical. You cannot ensure a proper rebased initial set this way, hence 32bit rebase error will be more likely. I didn't make progress in the autorebaser for cpan installs. >> Another two months have passed and there's still no response from Reini, nor >> do we have a release of perl-5.18 on x86_64. Can someone suggest a way to >> move forward? Is Reini still with us? > > Reini? Ping? Your last reply to the issue is from Aprl 9th, and you > never replied to the problems outlined by Yaakov the same day. I'm reading but I cannot work on it, since my machines are still on the ship from the US to Europe. > P.S: If Reini doesn't reply within the next two or three weeks, I'd say > perl is up for grabs. But I'm fine if Achim takes it, since he caused too many troubles in his x86_64 packaging changes for the 32bit port, which I didn't want to follow. -- Reini Urban http://cpanel.net/ http://www.perl-compiler.org/