From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 2155) id 315A03857033; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 10:02:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 315A03857033 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1692093758; bh=jojcXeZrlQIJyRSOMYk423KYtRJr9EgMkkgDptbUWcY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YUpnQ48bhUrc9GMLQlzC9IsXHvErukOmBA3wFz777x/Fn68q/ff7ibxC+AzN24H9v v2U4j+xAewZdc84zxKmTEwZA7l/beX3yNP8NNJggUZAA+tq0fx7UsVsbj1hsiNgXnp aVoX622fltW8Q72xdiTG0DPTHRhMKYqLsgS4Tz3s= Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 14003A80CDB; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 12:02:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 12:02:36 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: Christian Franke Cc: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [PATCH rebase 1/2] Always update the file checksum in the PE header Message-ID: Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: Christian Franke , cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: On Aug 15 11:29, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Aug 12 14:26, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > > This patch is still experimental, but tested with all /bin/cyg*.dll from my > > > installation. > > Does that mean I shouldn't apply it for now, or do you want me to > > apply it but not create a new release yet? > > > > Meantime I did more tests, also a few with 32-bit DLLs, which all succeeded. > So it should be safe to use. > > In conjunction with the "Don't update the PE header timestamp unless -t is > used" patch, rebase results are reproducible. Pushed. I've started deploying a rebase 4.6.6. Thanks, Corinna