From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A90D53858D20 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 06:48:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A90D53858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id n10so11164892edv.2 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 22:48:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8upKVgSfaoSanonBZ/Vgv4+xq4kMGIkMZriCnJ0WfZU=; b=k0udEAw7Nsh1nbXsXCKiONXL8pTsoj4mUEOzl7/Xi38womP7Tu+eT1CAIcNbLYzd8b ExMYGdoJxbMitB+sdLenZXKli1TP8ivpfQalumgRmWf+yz1SoAJXZyXKr3a2EiU2faSJ rVRu08B/7GscGc385tKoNnSSE1DxHFZP2jiCdn5JRmqIaMBxlq414YKQk9CFTEBxIeW0 RdzqbthfzXC8wyP++jHw00ebA2syBL3X4+kQRitnWYhdLghJL8JmQGgDKe8Ot36h26Vu T712eCzLueLcgx4Tvz5DmTV3AgTajnq+0IRf2tiM1g1pk/n965NpZIyIkP4s5IHJTKuf B+2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8upKVgSfaoSanonBZ/Vgv4+xq4kMGIkMZriCnJ0WfZU=; b=RB/UeyjOnXDs9/xwG2DyX3u5dNjmOPnk5bLYQiFRR/N0IS6GWqoCusZNVtaAWdDa5t 9ngiOWe3cNNSO+01/A1vuPPAMjpkLtBuaPCLAa/ACt377qtVY6gGCrweEXNRKR+xt9sG gGSASelPeDJo/gQKL+tmIFzJVnevGXf0Di+3XMESWrNSWY9JpfKnLa05fHJlsNgwKznI 6OqG5affNm3Ll1gOiTORatI8fyNOwif65ntPddoQHtpkC5i1lHnPqtwFJPswbGpWtTgS R7F25c0FyAu48hTGtv6S/efdaU0KSTX6evqWL4mvYYuzdR+1OYl/+26/Gj2HyZqoahuR VtMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533uMQiUDyibYi1JhifCB182oh3aPqs1AjElVqF/CZcLBsWhd1da LwUaRA4W1RN1+B51L1K7R2SYxJB7mW4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyRifFapmhoiSNU4TFFCtNh7Qi5MiCzY0KJecDzcx0QK0n6GfSAiuW7IgnFWENIKd+tlalN2g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:f0c:: with SMTP id i12mr1655410eda.156.1643957286751; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 22:48:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cc:9f05:ad7e:5c85:fc25:901e:12aa? (p200300cc9f05ad7e5c85fc25901e12aa.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cc:9f05:ad7e:5c85:fc25:901e:12aa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bs4sm442517edb.84.2022.02.03.22.48.06 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Feb 2022 22:48:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 07:48:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1 Subject: Re: Tox issues with Python 3.6 and 3.7 Content-Language: it To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: From: Marco Atzeri In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 06:48:09 -0000 On 03.02.2022 20:34, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote: > On 20/01/2022 14:56, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> This is a follow-up to Marco Atzeri and I talking about tox in the >> Python 3.9 email thread. I have just started trying to use tox for >> testing python-imaging. >> >> I have found that tox has some issues on Python 3.6 and 3.7, namely that: >> >> 3.6: >> >> Marco, I assume you didn't have these problems when you tested, or you >> found a way to fix them. Having never used tox before, I'm at a bit of >> a loss, any ideas? >> >> Hamish >> >> > *Bump* as it seems this slipped past everyone's radar. > > Hamish Hi Hamish, just very low on my priority list if you pass the test on 3.9 is already enough for me Regards Marco