From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from re-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com (mailomta4-re.btinternet.com [213.120.69.97]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 638F53968C21 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 17:14:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 638F53968C21 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk Received: from re-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.54.4]) by re-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20210504171418.OQRE1748.re-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com@re-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net> for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 18:14:18 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com X-SNCR-Rigid: 5ED9BDD03188DF2E X-Originating-IP: [81.153.98.246] X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.153.98.246 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdefiedgudduvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhnucfvuhhrnhgvhicuoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeguefhkedvfeeigefhhedtjeehieegtdehhffhheffgfehheegtdffleejteeuueenucfkphepkedurdduheefrdelkedrvdegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddrudduudgnpdhinhgvthepkedurdduheefrdelkedrvdegiedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukhequceuqfffjgepkeeukffvoffkoffgpdhrtghpthhtohepoegthihgfihinhdqrghpphhssegthihgfihinhdrtghomheq X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.111] (81.153.98.246) by re-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.340) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 5ED9BDD03188DF2E for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Tue, 4 May 2021 18:14:18 +0100 Subject: Re: duplicate between packages To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" References: From: Jon Turney Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 18:13:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3571.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 17:14:20 -0000 On 27/04/2021 04:45, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: > Hi Maintainers, > > as I just found 2 of my packages colliding with same program name > > $ cygcheck -f /usr/bin/ncgen > hdf4-4.2.15-3 > netcdf-4.8.0-2 > > as one is much older than the other, the installation sequence > can give some inconsistencies in the system. > > So I checked on my /etc/setup how many duplicates there are > and it seems also other package has the same problem > > Some are not an issue, but on the binaries I can not judge Yeah, nothing prevents this from happening at the moment. I did think that calm could do some checking of this (since it needs to look at the files in a package to generate the data used by the 'search package contents' web page). But since we can't know about the contents of packages which might come from 3rd-party package repos, I think this also needs to be a feature of setup.