From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 45608 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2017 20:04:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 45593 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2017 20:04:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:192.168.2 X-HELO: mail-wm0-f43.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 20:03:57 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id u26so8628741wma.0 for ; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:03:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=X/uXyFldQy/fBuvZORX0x1p5xsVaOv7+ED+BIPKniPQ=; b=WS07tPFtaIlpsC/PQ5GOpbkL4xd1j6dGlsk3oIglLAxFNpzE7G864cdINaqzWs52/v mKUjlKwBRYKwt3AJ8imn6sd2UrpO/7Ze2PBEfu0t8YldmG0KF0do8pnNCgbszi8nBQYr et3OCKxW0LAFn7h0pvBKf9QRE2DXR7/FkSPgvfnt52JnxVg10PRCUBryZgu3CzT6D4bS /zStdP8h92bKC+dDz090Iss1gMg9pGDUyQgy0DHRgeLtMtAOVDYJNYNXHdLsNA5xMgBX +8rIr9jtmJFTCYdOCIqejhaGpuA92gAiAHpwuwrc6TxLUnUM48H5kP70BbIvg0Gw6vch 1Cxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUh/bjcTlTUVGGLMhNfVHY5JB61Mt0bXKiPBUeKgCs5luNGQ9Ffj ADsfELJeOwO8J2Ih X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4UczQLlItQWYv+pQEVwrffSvPhfShs3G5l33N5DpPTYRri+f5FyaIWNMVNjfZ+nL3J5Xd74g== X-Received: by 10.28.28.84 with SMTP id c81mr1073864wmc.152.1504555435538; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (p4FDB36C3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.219.54.195]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e8sm1726774wmf.37.2017.09.04.13.03.54 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: ImageMagick 6 vs 7 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 20:04:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On 04/09/2017 21:52, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > Marco, > > A recent discussion on Fedora's devel list has brought to my attention > that ImageMagick 7 would be incompatible with 6 not only wrt API/ABI but > also wrt CLI (affecting scripts etc.). It would seem prudent to stick > with the 6 series for the time being until the Linux distributions sort > this out. > > If you concur, would you mind updating ImageMagick to the latest 6.9 > release? It seems to be somewhat behind at the moment. > I was not planning to move to 7.x for the time being. I will look on latest 6.9 but I had the impression they bumped the API in anycase. It is the worst package as stability that I am aware... Regards Marco