From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19685 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2017 12:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 19238 invoked by uid 89); 6 Sep 2017 12:29:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:172.20.10, H*RU:!172.20.10.3!, Hx-spam-relays-external:!172.20.10.3!, H*r:ip*172.20.10.3 X-HELO: mail-wm0-f52.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:29:23 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 137so27594362wmj.1 for ; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 05:29:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lA5yoHqpOn80Jczx1FBhDUHMgKYyM0evPTWffOSgGKo=; b=bm4ngoiOFUpj37zjtTpay2p7sbuItm7mhhkKSJ661viF7clsWBV5DtqzEym/0sWROz VyVXmKEBTwIg0PHA1j+GZyh78WuiQD3qNcBRWjJCfkSSoCg2+5912DGw2YGaK+5X+tOb FJ1aixmjpZYJalpsmKNVn1bMeU9n2WBnH0btejhCzl5/Jpg4JwYiE+mskbtgTeeO9OxQ RhEND49ZaG+p99zHlLQhs9CThLohI04u9hCZPLT9KY+Eal99Zzn8DTo8ojlzlcON0Y6J KVHgSo3DkAtf+7scAinqgjb2jUgK8UTB19JOlCfqa2V8gLnoJ5k3Oxz5GJpdETkYkeHB v7WQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhAdfeOoXbUHCYLEo61I1CWduBWPlzjMrvKspIpleAL5+MalCK1 ExIEp3mfScwmugvegaY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb5uKM61LdzfWDZ8urQbNOHpscLsDd/qBA5gHs8PwEXJMUnXYT4Wi9c5pgBxY0MD6VdMkpncOg== X-Received: by 10.28.208.75 with SMTP id h72mr1451804wmg.163.1504700961423; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 05:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.10.3] (ip-109-42-0-203.web.vodafone.de. [109.42.0.203]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 187sm1779577wmm.42.2017.09.06.05.29.20 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Sep 2017 05:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: ImageMagick 6 vs 7 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <9bebcb64-6be2-06e3-7bba-60bb2d3debd5@cygwin.com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9bebcb64-6be2-06e3-7bba-60bb2d3debd5@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On 05/09/2017 00:38, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-09-04 15:03, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> On 04/09/2017 21:52, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> A recent discussion on Fedora's devel list has brought to my attention >>> that ImageMagick 7 would be incompatible with 6 not only wrt API/ABI but >>> also wrt CLI (affecting scripts etc.).  It would seem prudent to stick >>> with the 6 series for the time being until the Linux distributions sort >>> this out. >> It is the worst package as stability that I am aware... > > It's definitely among the worst. I do wonder if at least 6 will settle > down ABI-wise with 7 out, but given their history, who knows. > uploaded. They changed 3 times API between 6.9.5 and 6.9.9.