Re: Where have svt-av1 1.8.0-2 gone?

[Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>]

On 16/03/2024 00:48, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:39:33 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
[...]
>>
>> This expected:
>> 1.8.0-1 -> 1.8.0-2 -> 2.0.0-1
>> libsvtav1(1.8.0-1) -> libsvtav1enc1(1.8.0-2) + libsvtav1dec0(1.8.0-2)
>> 	-> libsvt1enc1(1.8.0-2) + libsvtav1dec0(2.0.0-2)
>>
>> However, this does not seem to work as I expected.

What unexpected thing happens?

I guess you only get one of libsvtav1enc1 or libsvtav1dec0 (since if 
these both are marked "obsoletes: libsvtav1", to the dependency solver 
that mean that either of can replace libsvtav1, and provides everything 
that it provides.

So maybe the best solution is:

libsvtav1dec0_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1
libsvtav1dec0_REQUIRES=libsvtav1enc1

So libsvtav1 is replaced by both libsvtav1dec0 and libsvtav1enc1

>> My expectation was that both libsvtav1enc1(1.8.0-2) and libsvtav1dec0(1.8.0-2)
>> are installed for upgrading libsvtav1(1.8.0-1).
>>
>> Instead, I found
>>
>> 1.8.0-2:
>> libsvtav1_CATEGORY="_obsolete"
>> libsvtav1_REQUIRES="libsvtav1enc1 libsvtav1dec0"
>> libsvtav1enc1_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Enc-1.dll"
>> libsvtav1dec0_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Dec-0.dll"

Yeah, this should work, but is not longer preferred because you end up 
with an empty libsvtav1 hanging around forever...

>> works as expected.
>> Is it possible to change it like this now?

I've tweaked the existing dependencies based on my reasoning above. 
Please let me know if this still isn't working right.