From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 551 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2017 05:22:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 536 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2017 05:22:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, maintainership, joint, H*F:D*cygwin.com X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 05:22:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61DA63DEEB for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 05:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.120.87] (ovpn-120-87.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.87] (may be forged)) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v165MTJ7030859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 00:22:30 -0500 Subject: Re: perl-DateTime et.al. To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <87r33dsz3o.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 05:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87r33dsz3o.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On 2017-02-04 10:24, Achim Gratz wrote: > the versions of these in Cygwin get really long in the tooth and there > are several packages out there that have started to require the newer > versions available. Could you please either update them or give me > co-maintainership so I can keep them updated during the regular > maintenance of all the other Perl distributions? Thanks. I have given you joint maintainership of most of the Perl packages. -- Yaakov