From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from re-prd-fep-045.btinternet.com (mailomta25-re.btinternet.com [213.120.69.118]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF41385DC1A for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:14:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6CF41385DC1A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk Received: from re-prd-rgout-002.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.54.5]) by re-prd-fep-045.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20200407171455.FEIG3906.re-prd-fep-045.btinternet.com@re-prd-rgout-002.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net> for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:14:55 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com X-Originating-IP: [31.51.205.58] X-OWM-Source-IP: 31.51.205.58 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudehgddutdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecukfhppeefuddrhedurddvtdehrdehkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddruddujegnpdhinhgvthepfedurdehuddrvddthedrheekpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqecuuefqffgjpeekuefkvffokffogfdprhgtphhtthhopeeotgihghifihhnqdgrphhpshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhmqe X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.117] (31.51.205.58) by re-prd-rgout-002.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.340) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 5E3A15B609D2272F for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:14:55 +0100 Subject: Re: cygport patches for consideration To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" References: <87k12tbw5u.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <878sj7ck7e.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: Jon Turney Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:14:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878sj7ck7e.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 17:14:58 -0000 On 07/04/2020 17:52, Achim Gratz wrote: > Yaakov Selkowitz writes: > >>> Automatically create a test release if the release string starts with a literal "0" >> >> Nak. There is not necessarily any correlation between a -0.* release >> and whether it should be test or not. > > Then there ought to be. :-) The current package naming guidelines say that a release starting with '0' should be used for pre-release versions. Those are not necessarily test versions.