From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22548 invoked by alias); 20 May 2016 15:10:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 22483 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2016 15:10:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=robot, kilroy, Kilroy, Turney X-HELO: mail-wm0-f68.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f68.google.com) (74.125.82.68) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 20 May 2016 15:10:07 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id n129so29976743wmn.1 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 08:10:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qDLLoi6/pkhzoEwrnUzZ73cCPEgXrlL5zdH1KNsNeKo=; b=J2FEUKq2SfWleoSxmNMFKkfPna+cApwUpdk/MCesCDYyMvpRmwkQhbetX56u2/IMhH QDuyGhZ/2C+lomN4QMQ1Z7llUQZyQ7aN5J7Etre7bBS6569+8UeCNM/xNJ5qM6VxIlkB tASj4csB7uBkzAAzpygMt0sCC2kokh7z+dNFTvc7C+YMGRRsE2GAtIcKRG15RVBK3v7O IDbpBH8uo544fAXy6/lEB8BCNtxMkTNZIViwm8FVEfR+B5/QJar45Dby1bhpBBRdRCNg DoB2YBcl+cY7AYXq75a9qKSDBE0I4Nl+Bv7kwnYxufpEoWBfJ7inlDIpn5okE/+FrwfX VQpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUTawN4mopoYLQ/W/yhR5mbVZwr0rBSLtATfB7QZavHHjXU7KBsZg0F8YZlRkiq+A== X-Received: by 10.28.210.80 with SMTP id j77mr4595894wmg.94.1463757004143; Fri, 20 May 2016 08:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.21.188.188] ([149.6.156.42]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm5022575wmy.8.2016.05.20.08.10.03 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 20 May 2016 08:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC] splitting documentation To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 15:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 moving back to apps. On 20/05/2016 16:41, Jon Turney wrote: > On 19/05/2016 22:34, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> To move the documentation in a noarch package >> I split lilypond in two source packages. >> >> http://matzeri.altervista.org/noarch/lilypond-doc/ >> http://matzeri.altervista.org/x86/lilypond/ >> http://matzeri.altervista.org/x86_64/lilypond/ >> >> The documentation is just a copy of the upstream PDF so : >> - the source package is a dummy to avoid data duplication > > I can see why you want to do this, but I'm not sure it's a good idea. > > One reason being, *IF* we were to ever end up in the situation where > only source packages were uploaded, and some build service constructed > the binary packages, that builder would not be permitted to download > arbitrary files. I see no advantage for a build robot on this issue, where we are just packing data. As alternative there is no source package to be built and we just put together the binary one. $ cygcheck -l lilypond-doc /usr/share/doc/lilypond/pdf/essay.pdf /usr/share/doc/lilypond/pdf/learning.pdf /usr/share/doc/lilypond/pdf/music-glossary.pdf /usr/share/doc/lilypond/pdf/usage.pdf The packages with no source package are currently R_autorebase Marco Atzeri base-cygwin Corinna Vinschen chere Dave Kilroy cygcheck-dep Mikhail Usenko plus all the tesseract-ocr- that are mine. Regards Marco