From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25510 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2013 08:58:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 25483 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jul 2013 08:58:49 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:58:48 +0000 Received: from omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.71]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 28wn1m0011YDfWL518yheL; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:58:41 +0000 Received: from helium.5200-glenwood.net ([69.140.37.22]) by omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 28yg1m00N0UgAyD3g8yhjT; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:58:41 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=helium.5200-glenwood.net) by helium.5200-glenwood.net with smtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V06WO-0000Qx-Op for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 04:58:40 -0400 From: Andrew Schulman To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: remaining missing packages in 64-bit release Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20130713190538.GA5280@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archive: encrypt X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 > On 2013-07-14, at 03:44, Andrew Schulman wrote: >=20 > > There are of course other packages that could be called missing because > > they haven't been ported to x86_64 yet, and other packages that depend = on > > them can't be released until they are. There are two that I'm waiting = on: > >=20 > > ocaml - for orpie and unison > > rgb - for sng >=20 > About OCaml, I've tried to compile it, and the bytecode version seems to = work OK, but the native compiler will need some porting and I'm quite busy = now with the next release of OCaml, so I figured I would resume working on = it after the release (sometime in August). Is this really a blocking point? It is for orpie and unison, yes, since they're written in OCaml. Thanks for the update. Whenever OCaml is ready for x86_64, I'll test it by building those two packages. Andrew