From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net (omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net [3.97.99.32]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87F93858425 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2023 17:50:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E87F93858425 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=Shaw.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=shaw.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org E87F93858425 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=3.97.99.32 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701625828; cv=none; b=F9F4uiHdhaxtzZ0Nhid60be0/7nMHD48uo0+4MdPbxKegDgpEOoGxQ17u/KlXX+Lriy0wscdwKBkyk72qq/vIRwuxpnfe6i7BaIjG2sKDcN4MgJSjnJ6b2MGQCaZCyWRTKwbItehFgbKG5yfmFdJrqYHLRSo567y7a8mMiamwJA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701625828; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EkSGP3VVqBOEN132TtEkMyYgfbD8MYx8rmEIMxkWTF8=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=XzPvykZGb5SruozSL6RGX70yQYQ0D9t6rnRSnTnQXtLZSCEuy+B5xSBZZjM3nmzPoPj5265X8lTuRqeCp3s96UYKy45QDK1GaDw3bP/6Q/ADotQ4eUZfzPG7YvGX2Jd4JPjnDeVbiNKmprmokET20Mn4mdgMj7Gik6sMib2BhQA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from shw-obgw-4001a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.228.9.142]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id 9l5sryvHG8jpT9qbprVJV9; Sun, 03 Dec 2023 17:50:25 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=shaw.ca; s=s20180605; t=1701625825; bh=EkSGP3VVqBOEN132TtEkMyYgfbD8MYx8rmEIMxkWTF8=; h=Date:Reply-To:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=THBkcr9e833VpbyiYz1XsGzRSx52A+9RhgUX8v9umluv6UMs7xQesoXab/3+vxXqg 6G1GfGZErNJloySejM6O+FyxDt+JcNTl2iPdJETEj00hOgW0+tVT62FGZllUp6cp6i +D8MgOYiqGK6D95UVLE0WHt9eY4Ai7ligL74GDhfMD3uFZP61xPTPoo7RLRifS3iB7 OBok2m/bkMGQcV3kr2Q/F91goHwQgXwxb1qAvB6L4uTSblh0TihF/EWFi0V09A/jBz vPjb4BeMmlbMiyV6QnsrIqKO3S64nbkx4w1v3zA0Yo4m+A+AedRlXfN7sc2s5pRvW7 1wCCP5nYzYkHg== Received: from [10.0.0.5] ([184.64.102.149]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 9qbpr4AvaU5YW9qbprWrCZ; Sun, 03 Dec 2023 17:50:25 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=CZQbWZnl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=656cbfe1 a=DxHlV3/gbUaP7LOF0QAmaA==:117 a=DxHlV3/gbUaP7LOF0QAmaA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=WyRkiQzb7dW8bl4VtCQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 10:50:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [NMU] inkscape 0.92.3-2 (Test) To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <695e1455-23bc-4758-9e6d-b6a21991ab79@dronecode.org.uk> <30c5f6fa-71ea-0854-809d-6644f287d322@maxrnd.com> Content-Language: en-CA From: Brian Inglis Organization: Inglis In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfMlLStrvTxwlCydGRz+mL4geNUioMNBYU5hUhe/tiCQYrpGqEGvjKXiDhNRjbidaiBtciJVKgMqU9LhSwETRZN9N/0ojziz4ZmGNht4+qVEqgBvMFOC6 XP0Qycf98Cau7xjRNmtQmtUE4IisYKoXeTkHipCjiQqszUYm/6EsjIsMYxzQhU+kQrQphaCVt7rA0w== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2023-12-03 08:33, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: > On 01/12/2023 09:17, Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps wrote: >> >>> If you have ideas about how to make things work better, I'm all ears. >>> >>> For the moment, I tweaked things to let your upload through. >> >> Thanks Jon.  I have only seen a handful of NMUs go by and it didn't occur to >> me that those doing them were explicitly allowed to. >> >> ISTM the process works fine as it is.  If I happen to have a future itch to do >> an NMU should I handle it as I did this one?  Or say something on cygwin-apps >> beforehand?  I don't expect it will be often.  I'm totally fine not being on >> the "trusted" list for this type of thing. > > If you ask in advance, that's possibly slightly less work for me, but either is > fine really. > > Maybe I should make things so that all maintainers can NMU orphaned packages. > That seems reasonable I guess? Maybe Unmaintained except Base (i.e. alternatives crypto-policies) or "toolchain" defined as cygport and cygwin deps and build deps (i.e. bzip2 cocom docbook git-archive-all robodoc); maybe also all their deps and build deps, even Devel and Libs? Any of us or sourceware accounts could be hacked (possibly even targeted), and systems used to disrupt Cygwin processes, if someone had some dispute, wanted to be nasty, to see if they could do it, or made a mistake. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada La perfection est atteinte Perfection is achieved non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter not when there is no more to add mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à retirer but when there is no more to cut -- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry