From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sa-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com (mailomta30-sa.btinternet.com [213.120.69.36]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 092F03858298 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 13:04:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 092F03858298 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.38.6]) by sa-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20221008130424.QABO3226.sa-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com@sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net>; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 14:04:24 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 613942903E012198 X-Originating-IP: [81.129.146.212] X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.129.146.212 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeeiledgheejucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhnucfvuhhrnhgvhicuoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefhffevueeitefgieeltddviedtjedvfeduledtgeduheefheffvddtjedtffelheenucffohhmrghinheptgihghifihhnrdgtohhmpdhgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphepkedurdduvdelrddugeeirddvuddvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddurddutdeingdpihhnvghtpeekuddruddvledrudegiedrvdduvddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnqdgrphhpshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepkhgsrhhofihnsegtohhrnhgvlhhlrdgvughu X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.106] (81.129.146.212) by sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.716.04) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 613942903E012198; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 14:04:24 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 14:04:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: Scallywag TeX dblatex font requirements dependencies missing Content-Language: en-GB To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" , Ken Brown References: <65a59dea-123f-b574-6f84-eb56e0624703@SystematicSw.ab.ca> From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: <65a59dea-123f-b574-6f84-eb56e0624703@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1193.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_SPF_HELO,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 30/09/2022 19:25, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2022-09-30 07:01, Jon Turney wrote: >> On 29/09/2022 07:22, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> Hi folks, [Please Reply All as Cygwin mail blocked by ISP] >>> >>> Scallywag job failing complaining about TeX fonts. >>> Any ideas about what extra TeX font dependencies dblatex requires >>> under gtk-doc building docs for gsasl 2.2 under playground: >>> >>> https://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/jobs.cgi?id=4618 >>> >>> https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/3148865611/jobs/5119913953 > >> Googling the first error message leads me to suggest >> texlive-collection-fontsrecommended > > Thanks Jon, > > I planned to add that and ...extra, but shouldn't presumably required > fonts be TeX/LaTex/dblatex package dependencies, when not mentioned > anywhere in downstream packages, including in build scripts on other > systems? > > How are maintainers and users expected to make the connection, if nobody > mentions you need special "unrelated" font packages, in any of the > downstream packages? > > For example, for DbLaTeX, only the Windows install page mentions MikTeX > fonts, and there appears to be no other link between the abstract font > specs, the TeX fonts used, and packages required, although there appear > to be mentions of DejaVu "system" fonts, so do non-TeX font packages > also need installed e.g. dejavu-fonts or urw-base35-fonts{,-legacy}? > > Those who are not TeXies need a few more hints. I don't know. Maybe Ken has some insight?