* Re: calm: ncurses untest/vault previous version
[not found] <171552164803.529087.2015986368399506760@server2.sourceware.org>
@ 2024-05-13 5:25 ` Brian Inglis
2024-05-13 15:32 ` Jon Turney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Inglis @ 2024-05-13 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-apps
Hi folks,
Looks like after untest ncurses-6.5+20240427-1 calm decided the previous version
in the recommended format 6.4+20240330-1 was older than prev:
6.4-20231230
6.1-1.20190727
6.0-12.20171125
6.0-11.20170617
6.4-20240120
I can vault the old versions but could someone please unvault 6.4+20240330-1?
On 2024-05-12 07:47, cygwin-no-reply@cygwin.com wrote:
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-6.4+20240330-1-src.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-6.4+20240330-1-src.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-6.4+20240330-1.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-6.4+20240330-1.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-6.4-3.20230114-src.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-6.4-3.20230114-src.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-6.4-3.20230114.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-6.4-3.20230114.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncurses++w10/libncurses++w10-6.4+20240330-1.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncurses++w10/libncurses++w10-6.4+20240330-1.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncurses++w10/libncurses++w10-6.4-3.20230114.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncurses++w10/libncurses++w10-6.4-3.20230114.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncurses-devel/libncurses-devel-6.4+20240330-1.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncurses-devel/libncurses-devel-6.4+20240330-1.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncurses-devel/libncurses-devel-6.4-3.20230114.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncurses-devel/libncurses-devel-6.4-3.20230114.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncursesw10/libncursesw10-6.4+20240330-1.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncursesw10/libncursesw10-6.4+20240330-1.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncursesw10/libncursesw10-6.4-3.20230114.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/libncursesw10/libncursesw10-6.4-3.20230114.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-debuginfo/ncurses-debuginfo-6.4+20240330-1.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-debuginfo/ncurses-debuginfo-6.4+20240330-1.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-debuginfo/ncurses-debuginfo-6.4-3.20230114.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-debuginfo/ncurses-debuginfo-6.4-3.20230114.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-demo/ncurses-demo-6.4+20240330-1.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-demo/ncurses-demo-6.4+20240330-1.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-demo/ncurses-demo-6.4-3.20230114.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/ncurses-demo/ncurses-demo-6.4-3.20230114.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/terminfo/terminfo-6.4+20240330-1.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/terminfo/terminfo-6.4+20240330-1.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/terminfo/terminfo-6.4-3.20230114.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/terminfo/terminfo-6.4-3.20230114.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/terminfo-extra/terminfo-extra-6.4+20240330-1.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/terminfo-extra/terminfo-extra-6.4+20240330-1.tar.xz
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/terminfo-extra/terminfo-extra-6.4-3.20230114.hint
> INFO: vaulting x86_64/release/ncurses/terminfo-extra/terminfo-extra-6.4-3.20230114.tar.xz
> SUMMARY: 36 INFO(s)
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada
La perfection est atteinte Perfection is achieved
non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter not when there is no more to add
mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à retirer but when there is no more to cut
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: calm: ncurses untest/vault previous version
2024-05-13 5:25 ` calm: ncurses untest/vault previous version Brian Inglis
@ 2024-05-13 15:32 ` Jon Turney
2024-05-13 16:06 ` Brian Inglis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jon Turney @ 2024-05-13 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Inglis; +Cc: cygwin-apps
On 13/05/2024 06:25, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Looks like after untest ncurses-6.5+20240427-1 calm decided the
> previous version in the recommended format 6.4+20240330-1 was older
> than prev:
>
> 6.4-20231230
So, this would be a bug, if that's actually what happened, because
6.4+20240330 is definitely greater than 6.4 (under the "if all
comparison chunks are equal, the string with any suffix remaining is the
greater" clause of the comparison rule).
What actually seems to have happened is that 6.4+20240330 was still
marked as 'test', and so removed by the "packages labelled test: are
expired when a superseding non-test version exists" logic.
(Yeah, calm should probably be a bit more verbose about the reasons why
it's vaulting things in the report)
> I can vault the old versions but could someone please unvault
> 6.4+20240330-1?
Sure, I'll do that.
Do you want me to remove the test label from 6.4+20240330, or turn on
keep-superseded-test for this package?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: calm: ncurses untest/vault previous version
2024-05-13 15:32 ` Jon Turney
@ 2024-05-13 16:06 ` Brian Inglis
2024-05-13 20:18 ` Jon Turney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Inglis @ 2024-05-13 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin-apps
On 2024-05-13 09:32, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On 13/05/2024 06:25, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Looks like after untest ncurses-6.5+20240427-1 calm decided the
>> previous version in the recommended format 6.4+20240330-1 was older
>> than prev:
>>
>> 6.4-20231230
>
> So, this would be a bug, if that's actually what happened, because
> 6.4+20240330 is definitely greater than 6.4 (under the "if all comparison chunks
> are equal, the string with any suffix remaining is the greater" clause of the
> comparison rule).
>
> What actually seems to have happened is that 6.4+20240330 was still
> marked as 'test', and so removed by the "packages labelled test: are
> expired when a superseding non-test version exists" logic.
Thanks Jon,
Missed that focusing on the versions not the labels in setup.ini.
> (Yeah, calm should probably be a bit more verbose about the reasons why
> it's vaulting things in the report)
>
>> I can vault the old versions but could someone please unvault 6.4+20240330-1?
>
> Sure, I'll do that.
>
> Do you want me to remove the test label from 6.4+20240330, or turn on
> keep-superseded-test for this package?
Sorry, I should have noticed and untest-ed that immediately before 6.5!
Please remove test label to unvault as "prev" not test.
I've been running with it since released as test, until 6.5, and it is the final
6.4 we made available, in case anyone has issues with 6.5.
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada
La perfection est atteinte Perfection is achieved
non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter not when there is no more to add
mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à retirer but when there is no more to cut
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: calm: ncurses untest/vault previous version
2024-05-13 16:06 ` Brian Inglis
@ 2024-05-13 20:18 ` Jon Turney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jon Turney @ 2024-05-13 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Inglis; +Cc: cygwin-apps
On 13/05/2024 17:06, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On 2024-05-13 09:32, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>> On 13/05/2024 06:25, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Looks like after untest ncurses-6.5+20240427-1 calm decided the
>>> previous version in the recommended format 6.4+20240330-1 was older
>>> than prev:
>>>
>>> 6.4-20231230
>>
>> So, this would be a bug, if that's actually what happened, because
>> 6.4+20240330 is definitely greater than 6.4 (under the "if all
>> comparison chunks are equal, the string with any suffix remaining is
>> the greater" clause of the comparison rule).
>>
>> What actually seems to have happened is that 6.4+20240330 was still
>> marked as 'test', and so removed by the "packages labelled test: are
>> expired when a superseding non-test version exists" logic.
>
> Thanks Jon,
>
> Missed that focusing on the versions not the labels in setup.ini.
>
>> (Yeah, calm should probably be a bit more verbose about the reasons why
>> it's vaulting things in the report)
>>
>>> I can vault the old versions but could someone please unvault
>>> 6.4+20240330-1?
>>
>> Sure, I'll do that.
>>
>> Do you want me to remove the test label from 6.4+20240330, or turn on
>> keep-superseded-test for this package?
>
> Sorry, I should have noticed and untest-ed that immediately before 6.5!
> Please remove test label to unvault as "prev" not test.
> I've been running with it since released as test, until 6.5, and it is
> the final 6.4 we made available, in case anyone has issues with 6.5.
OK. Done.
6.4-20231230 was vaulted to stay under the count of kept versions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-13 20:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <171552164803.529087.2015986368399506760@server2.sourceware.org>
2024-05-13 5:25 ` calm: ncurses untest/vault previous version Brian Inglis
2024-05-13 15:32 ` Jon Turney
2024-05-13 16:06 ` Brian Inglis
2024-05-13 20:18 ` Jon Turney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).