From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 87247 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2018 14:58:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 87236 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jan 2018 14:58:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=uploads, Hx-spam-relays-external:ESMTPA X-HELO: out3-smtp.messagingengine.com Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.27) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 14:58:37 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DB520D58; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 09:58:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 28 Jan 2018 09:58:35 -0500 X-ME-Sender: Received: from [192.168.1.102] (host86-173-196-20.range86-173.btcentralplus.com [86.173.196.20]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2969924547; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 09:58:35 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [ITP] cmark: CommonMark parsing and rendering library To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: Cc: David Stacey From: Jon Turney Message-ID: Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 14:58:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 On 21/01/2018 23:30, David Stacey wrote: > 'cmark' is a prerequisite for the latest version of mkvtoolnix-gui. > 'cmark' is found in most major distros - see > https://pkgs.org/download/cmark > > The library does not have a 'so' version. I've had a look to see how the > major distros cope with this, and IMHO the most sensible is found in > openSuse. The approach used there is to append the version number to the > library package name. However, if anyone has a better way to cope with > the lack of 'so' number then I'd be very interested. > > Many thanks for taking a look, Looks fine to me. I added this to your uploads.