From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 104031 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2017 17:15:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 101700 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jun 2017 17:15:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Naming X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:15:19 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90CF212BA3 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:15:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 90CF212BA3 Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz@cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 90CF212BA3 Received: from [10.10.120.23] (ovpn-120-23.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC6D7E663 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Naming convention for versioned libraries To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:15:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 On 2017-06-11 13:13, Ken Brown wrote: > I'm about to ITP geomview, which will include a library package > containing DLLs of the form cyg*-1-9-5.dll. Should the package be > called libgeomview1_9_5 or libgeomview_1_9_5? I see both conventions in > the distro. libgeomview1.9.5 But, is this really a standalone library that can be used without geomview, or is it just a support library intended for geomview and any of its plugins? If the latter, then there should just be geomview and geomview-devel packages. -- Yaakov