From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from re-prd-fep-046.btinternet.com (mailomta23-re.btinternet.com [213.120.69.116]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38315384B0CB for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 12:57:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 38315384B0CB Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from re-prd-rgout-005.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.54.8]) by re-prd-fep-046.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20220524125723.RUTB3123.re-prd-fep-046.btinternet.com@re-prd-rgout-005.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net>; Tue, 24 May 2022 13:57:23 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 613A912424F37BCC X-Originating-IP: [86.139.167.41] X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.139.167.41 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrjeefgdehkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheduueevueejueejgeeufeehtddtkeevtdduieelfeetteeffeejjedukeefgffgnecuffhomhgrihhnpegthihgfihinhdrtghomhenucfkphepkeeirddufeelrdduieejrdegudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddruddthegnpdhinhgvthepkeeirddufeelrdduieejrdeguddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnqdgrphhpshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheplhgvmhhurhgvshdrlhgvmhhnihhstggrthhisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.105] (86.139.167.41) by re-prd-rgout-005.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.716.04) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 613A912424F37BCC; Tue, 24 May 2022 13:57:22 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 13:57:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: calm/mksetupini changes Content-Language: en-GB To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" , Lemures Lemniscati References: <20220523220948.ED0D.50F79699@gmail.com> <135fb374-2d39-2e71-697f-ce0986168c1d@dronecode.org.uk> <20220524190508.21E0.50F79699@gmail.com> From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: <20220524190508.21E0.50F79699@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1194.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 12:57:26 -0000 On 24/05/2022 11:05, Lemures Lemniscati wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2022 19:37:43 +0100, Jon Turney >> On 23/05/2022 14:09, Lemures Lemniscati wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 May 2022 21:31:46 +0100, Jon Turney >>>> Eventually, this should eliminate packages in the deprecated so report [1] with a rdepends count of zero. To reduce the rdpepends count to zero, packages which depend on a deprecated soversion need to be rebuilt for a newer soversion. >>>> >>>> [1] https://cygwin.com/packages/reports/deprecated_so.html >>> >>> Although libiconv2 is contained in the list above, >>> I don't think it is deprecated. >> >> Haha. I think this is just a bug, and the code which generates that report is getting confused by the test: status of libiconv2. >> >> Thanks for pointing that out. I'll look into fixing it when I can. > > All right. And yet another small point... > > I've uploaded libiconv 1.17-1 tagged with 'test', > but their statuses are 'stable' in the page of its src package: > https://www.cygwin.com/packages/summary/libiconv-src.html , > while the ones of generated libiconv packages are 'test': > e.g. https://www.cygwin.com/packages/summary/libiconv-devel.html . > > I was confused a bit by the situation :). Yes, this was the other half of this bug, a regression in cygport where the test: label wasn't correctly added to srcpkg hints. I'll fix this data and add a consistency check to calm.