From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 100333 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2019 13:59:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 100315 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2019 13:59:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:376, H*M:ee88, H*r:sk:mailout, advantages X-HELO: mailout05.t-online.de Received: from mailout05.t-online.de (HELO mailout05.t-online.de) (194.25.134.82) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:59:05 +0000 Received: from fwd39.aul.t-online.de (fwd39.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.138]) by mailout05.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id BEF254217405 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:59:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.127] (ZBfFMvZcohkvu88ENptf-vC0ICRgoos5CSkX21SlDA3Dd2c7D6KG+jZ9iVuwVXLww0@[79.235.160.27]) by fwd39.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1hqHnI-20MmPY0; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:59:00 +0200 Subject: Re: [ITP] mtr To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <9136fc20-39a5-6105-c8f9-b680911d1393@dronecode.org.uk> <0c51810f-9b4b-a817-62bb-2b5d9a70f3ac@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <99772313-ada0-8180-08b0-e94589f925db@dronecode.org.uk> <82116154-f157-cda0-0948-f26983f08832@t-online.de> From: Henning Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:59:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/56.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 On 24/07/2019 14:25, Brian Inglis wrote: > Alternatives mtr-tiny/nox11 and mtr-gtk have the advantages of being > unambiguous and already in use elsewhere, unless there are reasons > to prefer to follow Fedora for consistency in naming? I really don't care that much about naming. However, if it were an issue I would prefer the unambiguous version. Henning