From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8902A385800A for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 15:44:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8902A385800A Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id b9so25811851ejy.0 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 07:44:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/w0e8u11fDJEirEcL9vYaVZZx7xITP3D9pAcE4jQi28=; b=QtLjdHzlYeGet83iJNk9/gL282J3z5bfLMr9SMuOR372bWJrR1+Cc/92OOzfiCWjlW QaYmWmQXua6SbvDP5J9HXyukEImVh3RCImYHB6+3nZvTJYw4I6nFPG1Zazclsm4lEO25 87RancwEABVOxORZBB+VxhAm2RkL0TXVS7dhDs5sF6nmIvjsEGP6j5NGKXB0FOOJ4F6j O5WUtojKFGvxjZvhkSfVlFHoVud80cHph4B3tYADljtUi7WS3841UXF5/XUpbIXO4Bjz 3GZoD54X2g7Aq1wt46msveWHODQr1aV/qoE7/12LiKXLrvSO7Bhd0UGpDDuo1wxdBtN8 GENg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/cjDDTrWt7bXLPsTaNfwN+PGRiOzgZkLdVUX4q3xn69Tr+tIo oD5efeLylDfjW1V+t2ZS7uuHdPkA2j0TkQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMUH9Zn7etCqtw3svHazLWn/m2/Xh4MX1yLYyjmLOUHNTZWlBOtzo0TGlwVrQJydM6vhKq2w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:af49:: with SMTP id ly9mr51728274ejb.38.1609429462589; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 07:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.121] (p5dda1f06.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.218.31.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w20sm40184618edi.12.2020.12.31.07.44.21 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Dec 2020 07:44:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [ITA] libexif-0.6.22-1 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <87a6tupdgi.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20201231183235.4EB9.50F79699@gmail.com> <20201231195443.4EBD.50F79699@gmail.com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 16:44:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201231195443.4EBD.50F79699@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 15:44:24 -0000 On 31.12.2020 11:54, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote: > Helped by Achim Gratz, now I can tell ITA for libexif-0.6.22-1 again, > and, in a following mail, ITA for exif-0.6.22-1. > > -- > ITA for libexif, which has been maintained by Yaakov [1]. > > Now, the latest upstream of libexif is 0.6.22 [2]. > > A new candidate cygport file is placed at [3]. > And, it's been tested on Cygwin AppVeyor CI (ID 1557: [4]). > > Generated package files are placed at [5] and [6]: > > * libexif-common-0.6.22-1.tar.xz > * libexif-devel-0.6.22-1.tar.xz > * libexif12-0.6.22-1.tar.xz > > * libexif-0.6.22-1-src.tar.xz > * libexif-debuginfo-0.6.22-1.tar.xz it builds fine and pass the tests I would remove the pull for the shared lib printf -v "libexif${ABI}_REQUIRES" "%s" "libexif-common" of the general doc >>> libexif-common-0.6.22-1.tar.xz usr/share/doc/ usr/share/doc/libexif/ usr/share/doc/libexif/ABOUT-NLS usr/share/doc/libexif/AUTHORS usr/share/doc/libexif/ChangeLog usr/share/doc/libexif/COPYING usr/share/doc/libexif/NEWS usr/share/doc/libexif/README usr/share/doc/libexif/SECURITY.md but it is just my opinion > Regards, > > Lem > GTG Thanks & Regards Marco