From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 61910 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2017 20:13:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 61880 invoked by uid 89); 22 Feb 2017 20:13:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=distro, H*M:cygwin, Gratz, gratz X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:13:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28EF481239 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.120.240] (ovpn-120-240.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.240] (may be forged)) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1MKD5Kk031002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:13:06 -0500 Subject: Re: cloog-isl: rebuild or remove? To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <874m6m2d6p.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <33e8edbe-d17a-2017-576b-9ce8a165be3b@cygwin.com> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:13:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <33e8edbe-d17a-2017-576b-9ce8a165be3b@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 On 2016-08-15 12:29, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2016-08-15 11:45, Achim Gratz wrote: >> Yaakov Selkowitz writes: >>> All versions of gcc in the distro have been bumped to GCC 5, meaning >>> that nothing depends on cloog-isl anymore. Do you plan on rebuilding >>> the latter for the latest isl, or should it just be removed? >> >> I don't think there was ever any other consumer of that library, so I'd >> rather drop that package from the distro unless someone needs it. I've >> always built it with the exact version that gcc was wanting to have, and >> gcc switched to a different library by now. > > Alright, then I'll remove it once we're sure mingw*-gcc 5.4 is well tested. Done. -- Yaakov