From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mxd-2-a4c.seznam.cz (mxd-2-a4c.seznam.cz [IPv6:2a02:598:64:8a00::1000:a4c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 540F63857838 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 23:08:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 540F63857838 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=seznam.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=seznam.cz Received: from email.seznam.cz by smtpc-mxd-fcb8c47bd-k6mnh (smtpc-mxd-fcb8c47bd-k6mnh [2a02:598:64:8a00::1000:a4c]) id 4db7e0f1e8e1e20e4db7eeff; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:08:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seznam.cz; s=szn20221014; t=1670281688; bh=gOAIxeiQtUydX6n4svR2XN6JwOjhyrOuJ9WM7bEndeA=; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:User-Agent:Subject: References:To:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sHiG1CQgvInOJbyCSHl6LDmC2CsCjq6JTsJpxF/iogwRGSFV06ZsNOWguIblngbWs oUTSlv/Rzu9AXfS6fY7ANrhAGkG6+0F25uYiEgJ/WZc8rULIllNRGUXvisCRu2kZQx JIsAHwf5guTVkCSeAafn63tDIQ8Pb03H+jg14UtPK0ynpB4qE30TKD/wugbMW22A8N c16Lohd4HDzgBssJWhXXct+5y/+bc/OgfJYRIk3FpoS0eLSwyuNeIcjvJwXtIZqj9q SKX2ngGeUyVG9tlp0X+Yzsr8etHkuZZGu6rNowUBAPWQfCdASdTQ+0yZkSw3wmjyK2 GQKqL1p+h9bvQ== Received: from [192.168.2.5] (brno.ccbr.com [77.240.178.2]) by email-relay12.ko.seznam.cz (Seznam SMTPD 1.3.140) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:08:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 00:07:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: How does a package become orphaned? (was Re: Attn maintainer: python-paramiko) References: <3fdca14d-95fa-0398-46a9-6d5291ceae96@gmail.com> <0282d084-b2b2-132f-1e82-4159a4d1de05@gmail.com> <36a5d2b5-41f7-52a4-c95f-d9f2e4f12e96@dronecode.org.uk> <4c729833-8293-48d4-1b6d-d9f58e4d5137@dronecode.org.uk> <75efa4db-6f20-2521-b84e-4957ee55afc0@seznam.cz> <2b12ad01-36a6-da87-6cf8-bd925cde749e@gmail.com> To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com From: Libor Ukropec In-Reply-To: <2b12ad01-36a6-da87-6cf8-bd925cde749e@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Dne 02.12.2022 v 9:20 Marco Atzeri napsal(a): > On 01.12.2022 21:18, Libor Ukropec wrote: >> Dne 01.12.2022 v 20:41 Jon Turney napsal(a): >>> On 17/11/2022 10:24, Libor Ukropec wrote: >>>> Dne 16.11.2022 v 12:52 Thomas Wolff napsal(a): >>>>> >>>>>> What I do not want to do is the violent take over, so I gave some time to the >>>>>> original owner of the python-paramiko to respond. I created a bug on  github.com >>>>>> almost 2 weeks ago and so far no reaction: >>>>>> https://github.com/wildmichael/cygwin/issues/1 >>>>> As a general comment, I'd like to point out that "almost 2 weeks" is even less than >>>>> someone's holiday time may be... >>>> >>>> See above in the thread - author did not react here on cygwin for months. What I did, >>>> I've found the author on GitHub and contacted him there as well. >>>> >>>>  >>Jon Turney: It's undefined how many times we should ping, or how long we should >>>> wait for a response, but I think that the ~10 months that's elapsed here is more than >>>> enough! >>> >>> Yeah, 10 months is not 2 weeks. >>> >>> Libor, I've given you maintainer-ship of python-paramiko. >> >> Jon, >> >> I did not ask for it officially yet (quite busy and had issues with duplicity that >> depends on the paramiko itself, so I intentionally waited if something happens). >> >>  > >>  > If that's not what the desired outcome here, please let me know. >> >> I wanted that. >> >>> >>> Sorry for taking so long over this. >>> >>> I guess somebody should ping Michael Wild to ask about the rest of his packages. >> I already did that 29 days ago, no response yet >> https://github.com/wildmichael/cygwin/issues/1 >> >> The paramiko depends on python-bcrypt and python-nacl so I'd like to ask for their >> ownership too, otherwise the ownership for paramiko does not make sense. >> >> If Michael Wild by any chance responds and still would like to maintain those packages, >> I'll be happy to return them :) >> > > you can ITA  python-nacl > > there is little to do for python-bcrypt as newer versions require rust and we have no > compiler for it. Yes, I learned that 3.2.0 is the last we can support in Cygwin. I didn't notice that bcrypt is also for Python 3.9 (becuase nacl wasn't and all was in paramiko repository). In this case, I'm unblocked. Regards, Libor > > > Regards > Marco > > > > >