From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01BB53858CDB for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 18:26:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 01BB53858CDB Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id o20-20020a05600c4fd400b003b4a516c479so4228980wmq.1 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=7Fg8zy0M88lItsB2yFNIRN8DX4BNXlVE5AT3Zd5YSY4=; b=TbUdSHftYW9wxrXUIIzZAEyWBOt+yY93GpQnHINs6PYdWoKPCFCmOmVdSl2DgeAnD7 LpLR+Y/HIitmVkpl8pr2JTcZpx6/vSgx5PTJiSFBs9CdFMCLoQOIPXZ+xGoQx5VxEbHa F0O0l9ENL+YJ482vYJD7MY/lcIuehiVZn1+qBwhbPcpKOl/5TpJdMlduV307WoCYUx/1 RDDZVDi+55ljvJsz+lDoJGXBNGQ+PPZMHYOUHyyw7XCK3mxGxd1vix9gCa4UYX3cOTfe balkRbsX4xT0X/v2BDlqXCnoNB1XHNu0PpzpLsSpWXUuPnbiTX0elPJ7OqY7TSSi1ZWd IKpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7Fg8zy0M88lItsB2yFNIRN8DX4BNXlVE5AT3Zd5YSY4=; b=EA1LTKR75jo6YnVlj224tsMmKbydB83BdsZ/E6OHikf6B1avzduHSF6yu/IcVS0mib 7CJgf9z2nbF6qZXUf5E0r5mA4UHp38gzVJIelbU6/wQeG3udjEn910dsp3+dUVQ4sio5 Ic7CLdiK3bjVTK9IhPH4YAcIpK4hPyqH3lrIk0pTP72YX1yJHoWb4WubMWU+KI5QkqR0 JY0p/dxFSQ+Kuftb/7B2UycyM3JAjOj8F9Pu9r4b764LZ1V1iHGue54QxM3E2nG7VBC9 Sw23QSGg+9tWxejUIeyGT6ZRWLXW9XpixWafFbnLBWdwh/+1/CMNCeATd/dZwAwqkvyJ TABA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2/Nj4+P6AYjDrKApjwTr0R7a7nBcesxpTf/QP4pLZ8rt4BF8Vg o8E5A1gVm0D9/f4Mwh6/q9j+SGT2LpY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7SudsM9nPO6AAYpCJoLyJeonbH4xJqkZE0Wxt0oHJN5aDMg6JuWEpjZFpBZf5Qz2By2CA56w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:384a:b0:3c4:94f6:b459 with SMTP id s10-20020a05600c384a00b003c494f6b459mr2640809wmr.85.1665253605471; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 11:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w01.local (dslb-092-076-076-230.092.076.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [92.76.76.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16-20020a1c7410000000b003b27f644488sm5366535wmc.29.2022.10.08.11.26.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 08 Oct 2022 11:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: libffi: upgrade to libffi-3.4.3 proposed (cygport file attached) From: Hannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= To: Jon Turney , "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:26:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <93f7b9bc-43d1-00de-fca2-5ae762909022@dronecode.org.uk> References: <23b4f0439c8123bffa09fda381929c216aaeeee0.camel@gmail.com> <93f7b9bc-43d1-00de-fca2-5ae762909022@dronecode.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi John, I'm not sure. So far I would not recommend to upgrade to libffi-3.4.3 for Cygwin i686. Currently MSYS2 makes only builts for x86_64. The 32 bit version builts are only MinGW variants. Test for Cygwin on i686 is not in CI of libffi maintainer Anthony Green, e.g.https://github.com/libffi/libffi/pull/728 Maybe you open an Issue on https://github.com/libffi/libffi/issues Anthony Green is very responsive. Thanks, Hannes Am Samstag, dem 08.10.2022 um 13:47 +0100 schrieb Jon Turney: > On 04/10/2022 19:11, Hannes Müller wrote: > > Dear Maintainer(s), > > > > libffi is ORPHANED and outdated. > > > > Attached a cygport for newest libffi-3.4.3, which needs no extra > > patches. > > > > PS: libffi-3.4.3 is also used on MSYS2 without extra patches. > > > > Thanks! > > Thanks. > > I'm minded to do a NMU of libffi using your revised cygport, but I > notice that many tests fail on x86 (see [1]).  Is this expected, or > does > it indicate some problem there? > > [1] > https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/3205410540/jobs/5237942271#step:6:2343 >