From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 95662 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2016 23:40:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 95568 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2016 23:40:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:D*gov, H*r:Unknown X-HELO: blaine.gmane.org Received: from Unknown (HELO blaine.gmane.org) (195.159.176.226) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 23:40:29 +0000 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bllhA-0000nc-CF for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 01:40:24 +0200 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: libargp inconsistent packaging Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 23:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <877fad6mpr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <3vdntbh1h667ceajf0vc4g4f59am4f1ab7@4ax.com> <3vdntbh1h667ceajf0vc4g4f59am4f1ab7-e09XROE/p8c@public.gmane.org> <13da1a2d-623f-bb98-2fe6-26ea8ca37d8f@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 > On 16/09/2016 11:15, Andrew Schulman wrote: > >> Andrew Schulman writes: > >>> Hi Marco. I think I thought about this in the past, but because the total > >>> size of this package is so small, I decided it wasn't worth the trouble to > >>> split it in two. I think that both packages would have to include the doc > >>> files, so there wouldn't be much gain. > >> > >> You can't have the same files in two different packages, so if you > >> wanted to do that you'd need to psplit out a doc package as well and > >> have that as a required package for the other two. > > > > That would REALLY be overkill. No, they wouldn't be the same files, since they'd > > be in /usr/share/doc/libargp and /usr/share/doc/libargp-devel. > > > we need just 2 packages > that is more or less the default split > > libargp > /usr/bin/cygargp-0.dll > > libargp-devel > /usr/include/argp.h > /usr/lib/libargp.dll.a > /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/libargp.README > /usr/share/doc/libargp/COPYING > /usr/share/doc/libargp/COPYING.LESSER > /usr/share/doc/libargp/README.Cygwin OK then