From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 63648 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2015 20:16:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 63637 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2015 20:16:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.164) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 20:16:08 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.243]) by resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ckG11q00C5FMDhs01kG6Bn; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 20:16:06 +0000 Received: from 5200-glenwood.net ([69.140.37.22]) by resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ckG51q0090UgAyD01kG5p5; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 20:16:06 +0000 Received: from helium.5200-glenwood.net ([192.168.1.2]) by helium with smtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0y28-0002jq-T6 for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:16:04 -0400 From: Andrew Schulman To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ITP] unison2.48 Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 20:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <1433530021.14544.25.camel@cygwin.com> In-Reply-To: <1433530021.14544.25.camel@cygwin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archive: encrypt X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 > On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 12:06 -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > There's a new beta release of Unison, version 2.48. It's incompatible = with the > > previous releases, so we need a new package for it, unison2.48. I have= it built > > and ready to upload. Please add it to the Cygwin package maintainers l= ist, with > > me as maintainer. Thanks, Andrew >=20 > Done. Thanks. > BTW do you have any plans to build the GTK GUI versions? Not immediately. The last time I tried was several years ago, and there was some problem with lablgtk that kept it from working. That was many version= s of unison and lablgtk ago, so it would be worth trying again, but only if peop= le want it. For myself, I use command line unison every day, but have no need for the G= UI. And there's a Windows native build GUI, which probably meets many users' ne= eds, although not necessarily Cygwin users. So I don't know how many people wou= ld want the GTK GUI. I guess the thing to do would be to ask on the cygwin list, and see what the response is. Andrew