From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22136 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2011 06:27:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 22124 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2011 06:27:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.56) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:27:16 +0000 Received: from omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.88]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id pJPp1h0021uE5Es56JTHUT; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:27:17 +0000 Received: from helium.5200-glenwood.net ([68.49.23.87]) by omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id pJTG1h00J1skXbY3cJTGeL; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:27:17 +0000 Received: from sulfur.5200-glenwood.net ([192.168.1.235]) by helium.5200-glenwood.net with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RIwxH-0003A2-E0 for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 02:27:15 -0400 From: Andrew Schulman To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: lost announcements Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20111024203431.GA5193@jethro.local.lan> <20111024234752.GA31976@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20111025151849.GA8626@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20111025151849.GA8626@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archive: encrypt Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:17:40AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > >> >Hm, you're right. But the odd thing is that they weren't posted to t= he cygwin > >> >list, which is where I read them: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-1= 0/. > >> > > >> >Any idea why? > >>=20 > >> Embedded email address. > > > >Could you please be more specific? I've compared the 4 announcements, a= nd I > >can't see any relevant difference between them. The only email addresse= s I can > >see in the announcements for sng and stunnel are the To and From address= es, > >which are of course present in every announcement. There's also the uns= ubscribe > >address, which is generic and appears in the boilerplate of every announ= cement. >=20 > People have been removing the unsubscribe email address from their > announcements. Your announcements seem to contain extra MIME characters > which sometimes confuse the "raw email in body of message" check and > allow the message to sneak through. Thanks. I think I see what you're talking about, although I have no idea why they're there. Extra spaces that got converted for some reason I guess. So are you saying that the text we're supposed to add at the bottom of our announcements has changed? If so, can we please update the example at http://cygwin.com/setup.html#announcement, and notify this list? Andrew.