From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41014 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2015 19:09:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 41002 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2015 19:09:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:09:53 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id E564AA8057B; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:09:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:09:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Potential Enhancement Of 'noacl'? Message-ID: <20150417190950.GA8828@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com References: <20150417185606.GI3657@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1201 On Apr 17 15:02, Bryan Berns wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen > wrote: > > On Apr 17 14:11, Bryan Berns wrote: > > > >> Why would someone want to do this crazy thing? In short, I continue > >> to struggle with the current Cygwin permissions handling for certain > >> drives where programs do sanity checks on group readability (e.g., > >> ssh). > > > > That puzzles me. OpenSSH is upstream Cygwin-aware, and the code skips > > permission checks on files if the underlying filesystem does not support > > permissions (e.g. noacl or FAT FS). What problem do you have in real > > life with noacl? > > >=20 > Hmm... good question. I honestly not sure I put it to a practical test > -- I just saw it was reporting group read via 'ls -l' and stopped > there. I'll give it a shot on Monday. You may have made my day.... I > really didn't *want* to do what I was proposing :P Heh :) If you still find a problem when using ssh on a noacl filesystem, I'd lean towards fixing ssh in that case. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVMVp+AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gO5YQAICSVTMJAefIu5pN1z0i/joi Am9t8qUWgH+y5kn4Di3qXCKxzn6DmlwlU+hkucslnelK8Mtjbh0RKkJY1QMk94/H QNuIW0H2n8+TdIazRSmf4NSgycekqIbbogWYTaA2njSe7suZMOqz5NztmkGdXfhp ympOecEGJTq1AmFD+4Hk6/TbMwSoS4kOeIESQJRh5qUggQ1ezO2Y3CCueFE1EWvL K1oxFF2VdUmhXw0Gxiyx7IgHd5lMYBb8cQ5WoHAPwlySb+BCEPr3C9Xk5MNXOYa3 eHrKKg1YDr2NdyJtdNpZCWYOMueQesMK3H9YUQV+8R8KPAzrMyUzQtbbKylXpDzb LxEs/s8ehE+zOoHmeaZ7U6AUppU9ymrBkmOawNjWU/omCDmrGuVcLJ2zBPIFUJm3 85zPoIymbLMgI6dimVXdIpDPoCk4y7hnCVOKMcbSmfSb6KvYHmoJinj0fTO/0so3 1+O6k6/o2fQ4vv6XSZ2FSZrjIAuAP9Myvyf8LdvOnm4odGelkiUonfgHBXQxb7Tt CAMVH0G0OWHBYW/7jumZfqfhuA+SLJs9by+XpdVVspo0JpdhfcHDYNC2oIiOdmcj 55ScEJDOYQITBzwO9WM9beknnpiNgpu+5p2dpMJVrYrgwbexVnmu8ZCyCMFDEqlT litOKzJ04mU/eQflPm6/ =p7ZM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--