From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from conssluserg-05.nifty.com (conssluserg-05.nifty.com [210.131.2.90]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5275D3858419 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:26:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5275D3858419 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp Received: from Express5800-S70 (z221123.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [110.4.221.123]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-05.nifty.com with ESMTP id 1BCDQT4S016806 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 22:26:29 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-05.nifty.com 1BCDQT4S016806 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp; s=dec2015msa; t=1639315589; bh=b5VtxEvUdMWQ/ccUn3z+8Aqcg6tTD0bmE97c9IlF6x0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vbyzgS0ANBbGxpOX7Rw6em4cTINMWDmIXvV5d9Vl+929ZaiNWKYDsZht0atWeo3gW T48YB5KIprtpjdzz2RRJo3/LUeqBTx1Mowt7FQDqIf4hxExDypQosCnLBvuIlUM1BY esmI9fucjUcIpPi52kxOjF3GVPuaE+Zgx8SaS7mDJmJ3s/8dklD9muqN7FYl1+sHFR V4hvjyZyiQVdul8UNKGSsV8I7OArkxACbebEdiHMSbA7XSLUoxyI+WwpY5CY49lp2F S3KJsK/1/tX4PV3xN0MesawCDB4q1Y/N1kru2Bsk5GVzTo3csKOcKrEsSBeOIHB96s nxGvoe1m3EE1g== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [110.4.221.123] Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 22:26:31 +0900 From: Takashi Yano To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 3.3.0: Possible regression in cygwin DLL (Win10); fixed in snapshot Message-Id: <20211212222631.faffbddc15eb3b3a2cfa2768@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: <2cfa5de7-3b95-9062-4572-f36d304bc916@cornell.edu> <20211106151047.4d8f626bd6ebe9e4d8017f3b@nifty.ne.jp> <20211110173003.88359e8482ffa8b8be326903@nifty.ne.jp> <20211110223049.b61c6cb87fb3e540b4214bcf@nifty.ne.jp> <20211111201206.72cd688ce6a0d72d3a4f6c5f@nifty.ne.jp> <20211112173326.71a3a40fececc8a284238051@nifty.ne.jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin core component developers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:26:46 -0000 On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:02:46 +0100 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > In the meantime, you might want to merge your code into master, whenever > you think it's ready. I have rebased the topic/pipe branch to current master. In addition, I think we had already enough test period for new code in topic/pipe. What about merging it into master? Or does anyone have any concerns? BTW, how can we merge the topic/pipe branch? Using "git merge"? Or rebase master to topic/pipe branch, i.e. "git rebase topic/pipe"? -- Takashi Yano