From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C165385802B for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:46:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2C165385802B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com Received: from calimero.vinschen.de ([24.134.7.25]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue109 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M6DSo-1myFt60YEi-006gqx; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:46:36 +0100 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id A1247A8093B; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:46:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:46:33 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Why is _WIN64 not defined as 1 in _cygwin.h? Message-ID: Reply-To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com, "Z. Majeed" References: <1016746971.2414349.1637763426878.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1016746971.2414349.1637763426878@mail.yahoo.com> <743516839.2623934.1637863584991@mail.yahoo.com> <1907344113.875554.1637937234908@mail.yahoo.com> <2040290648.1078645.1638019007882@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2040290648.1078645.1638019007882@mail.yahoo.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:zUHN0T+K+yJ0zLOpNO1y9SJzRRi49LYFO8O3+Q2dvXPbtsfWcD2 OYTgRpTNFJ7UndunOA2+pMV00AYjicgNx9qKE5K/xzuI4jlo3jMQelqHso+1s27KYEMGUVL LSlMpOAGk3pyi4Aapfkz8jNTw9AvLUMHJ89wmU6YeP70fqPDqJD+TTnRYIlFMs9OPlH+ZDh kU7JLfqzL2h3MeFA2i5ag== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:LmvdFK3ulXA=:EhKMSptJ8W+cMgJSD0eHrW kWHUkejOxaxgMMVAGBoS27DCUu1B9zfbGc91EF3HcZNJ6gHGd+ZxLSiTF1ErtVZ+HAMpg/4Ql Ci4FEGk0eC6SZ26boXcJfE9XhALGVCy8XRb+e9vU6mDMPyIc/BJ4YbMdcWDjUdPQrG4SWI3oN s3sYaJi5MZMzy7zI7N0PTHPn5cM4+HQZz3H+IsIuvsTB+T2aDz8SHE8cUamtno4QVU7r2fTAW IecdVlSbq008cUasa/da7lhL6gxPAN8e0HYf8xLuPJXrFqi5pRLp6IAuNZZedSvK5NeY0K4+S A+SNQRS/TmfmtopbeI0NzbD+8eyTzVrAil+RFqY8TjJRCN7mLpeBNYZySWDjPYTZRV+3RP/VV yR9wmtpw9AitlC5QQlH/IYcbDh9yxr0tRBugfr9/dKQ4PlPqpw0CcTA5bI7JITZj0gX3uyfO0 Yz3o2lq0Brp6oJ+YglCbKkkmKzF3oOcceME7PLg9C5SC55aA3B240PdtoRzudcy8pJ5U8KVpt 2VuBMDFO4C1EPlQB2MenmFeBW6R5TEkYwiO4nEa0OpbrQI24QrY1nIB6+np/lQ3BOyHfofLWC 5wLG5kyE+d2wTe4a+saRXahqcl7AIfT+M1rJWxF+GrfOFhuoXBAm1xwVJL+N1JTuZ11dSW3X3 Kcye1cL2kkaHcQs711yoWiy5JHuZ3gQrKHAcI9Zmcl4yAvkc+cKHLW2FMd32IRHQz9Lo7ySc0 YqO3BqjIS6BCV+zN X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin core component developers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:46:44 -0000 On Nov 27 13:16, Z. Majeed wrote: > > > That was fast! Looks great Unfortunately it doesn't work as desired. In contrast to Linux, changing the limit to a higher limit doesn't produce an error. The new nested job has just a higher limit, while the limit of the parent job is enforced. Therefore, just adding a new nested job is not good. Apart from tha I noticed the call order was wrong Adding the process to the job should only occur *after* all other calls succeeded. > - does RLIM_INFINITY need special handling? I thought not and I already had written a lengthy explanation... which I spare you with, because the code has to be rewritten anyway... Corinna