From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from m0.truegem.net (m0.truegem.net [69.55.228.47]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F5263858405 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 01:18:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1F5263858405 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=maxrnd.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=maxrnd.com Received: (from daemon@localhost) by m0.truegem.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) id 19T1IeKS010625 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:18:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@maxrnd.com) Received: from 162-235-43-67.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net(162.235.43.67), claiming to be "[192.168.1.100]" via SMTP by m0.truegem.net, id smtpd1eKHpH; Thu Oct 28 18:18:37 2021 Subject: Re: branching 3.3? To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com References: From: Mark Geisert Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:18:37 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin core component developers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 01:18:43 -0000 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi guys, > > what do you think about branching the Cygwin master branch into master > and a 3.3 branch? We could add bug fixes to the 3.3 series and working > on new 3.4 stuff in master at the same time. For 3.4 I was thinking of > getting rid of some old cruft, as time permits. > > Good, bad, ugly? FWIW, Good, !bad, !ugly AFAICS. ..mark