From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sa-prd-fep-042.btinternet.com (mailomta2-sa.btinternet.com [213.120.69.8]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 875CD3858D35 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:56:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 875CD3858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from sa-prd-rgout-002.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.38.5]) by sa-prd-fep-042.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20230726155636.GFBW20040.sa-prd-fep-042.btinternet.com@sa-prd-rgout-002.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net> for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:56:36 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 64AECEEE01A5FD16 X-Originating-IP: [86.140.130.94] X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.140.130.94 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedriedvgdelfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhnucfvuhhrnhgvhicuoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffkeeigfdujeehteduiefgjeeltdelgeelteekudetfedtffefhfeufefgueettdenucfkphepkeeirddugedtrddufedtrdelgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddruddtiegnpdhinhgvthepkeeirddugedtrddufedtrdelgedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnqdguvghvvghlohhpvghrshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhmpdhrvghvkffrpehhohhsthekiedqudegtddqudeftddqleegrdhrrghnghgvkeeiqddugedtrdgsthgtvghnthhrrghlphhluhhsrdgtohhmpdgruhhthhgpuhhsvghrpehjohhnthhurhhnvgihsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgvthdrtghomhdpghgvohfkrfepifeupdfovfetjfhoshhtpehsrgdqphhrugdqrhhgohhuthdqtddtvd X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.106] (86.140.130.94) by sa-prd-rgout-002.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.814) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 64AECEEE01A5FD16 for cygwin-developers@cygwin.com; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:56:36 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:56:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: glib2.0 2.64.6-1 (TEST) Content-Language: en-GB To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com References: From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 26/07/2023 15:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jul 3 15:49, Jon Turney wrote: >> On 02/07/2023 15:30, Jon Turney wrote: >>> >>> The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: >>> >>> * libglib2.0_0-2.64.6-1 >>> * libglib2.0-devel-2.64.6-1 >>> * libglib2.0-doc-2.64.6-1 >>> >> [...] >>> >>> There are many test-suite failures, however, as far as I can tell, they >>> are not regressions, so this should work as well as it ever did. >> >> At least some of these test failures are due to bugs or shortcomings in the >> Cygwin DLL. In an ideal world, I'd have the time and motivation to >> investigate them all, but here's a brief summary of the few I looked into >> ... >> >> gdatetime: The _NL_CTYPE_OUTDIGITx_MB constants for nl_langinfo aren't >> defined (possibly because we don't have the required information, e.g. to >> produce Persian (as opposed to Arabic) digit characters in the fa_IR.utf-8 >> locale) > > Uhm... we actually have this information. Only, unfortunately I screwed > up the names: > > _NL_CTYPE_OUTDIGITSx_MB > > instead of > > _NL_CTYPE_OUTDIGITx_MB > > D'oh. > > Do you think we need the wrong names for backward compat? Theoretically > they should never have been used... A brief web search only finds the wrong names in the cygwin source code, so yeah, I'd say just fix it.