public inbox for cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: load average calculation failing -- fixed by Windows update
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 11:34:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ffea3eda-8c4a-a087-680b-87c9f039e5b0@dronecode.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YnzX0Ma0qWJP+NZV@calimero.vinschen.de>

On 12/05/2022 10:48, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On May 11 16:40, Mark Geisert wrote:
>>
>> The first counter read now gets error 0xC0000BC6 == PDH_INVALID_DATA, but no
>> errors on subsequent counter reads.  This sounds like it now matches what
>> Corinna reported for W11.  I wonder if she's running build 1706 already.
> 
> Erm... looks like I didn't read your mail throughly enough.
> 
> This behaviour, the first call returning with PDH_INVALID_DATA and only
> subsequent calls returning valid(?) values, is what breaks the
> getloadavg function and, consequentially, /proc/loadavg.  So maybe xload
> now works, but Cygwin is still broken.

The first attempt to read '% Processor Time' is expected to fail with 
PDH_INVALID_DATA, since it doesn't have a value at a particular instant, 
but one averaged over a period of time.

This is what the following comment is meant to record:

"Note that PDH will only return data for '% Processor Time' after the 
second call to PdhCollectQueryData(), as it's computed over an interval, 
so the first attempt to estimate load will fail and 0.0 will be returned."


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-13 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.BSF.4.63.2205051618470.42373@m0.truegem.net>
2022-05-08  7:01 ` load average calculation failing Mark Geisert
     [not found]   ` <223aa826-7bf9-281a-aed8-e16349de5b96@dronecode.org.uk>
2022-05-09  8:45     ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-05-09  8:53       ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-05-10  8:34       ` Mark Geisert
2022-05-10 13:37         ` Jon Turney
2022-05-11 23:40           ` load average calculation failing -- fixed by Windows update Mark Geisert
2022-05-12  8:17             ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-05-12  8:24               ` Mark Geisert
2022-05-12  8:43                 ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-05-12  9:48             ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-05-13 10:34               ` Jon Turney [this message]
2022-05-13 11:04                 ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-05-13 11:05                   ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-05-16  5:25                     ` load average calculation imperfections Mark Geisert
2022-05-16 16:49                       ` Jon Turney
2022-05-17  5:39                         ` Mark Geisert
2022-05-17 14:48                     ` load average calculation failing -- fixed by Windows update Jon Turney
2022-05-17 19:48                       ` Mark Geisert
2022-05-09 11:29   ` load average calculation failing Jon Turney
2022-05-10  8:21     ` Mark Geisert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ffea3eda-8c4a-a087-680b-87c9f039e5b0@dronecode.org.uk \
    --to=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk \
    --cc=cygwin-developers@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).