From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists@netbauds.net>
To: cygwin-licensing@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Rsync over ssh (pulling from Cygwin to Linux) stalls..
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44E18F20.3040700@netbauds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060814180137.GA26059@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:24:41PM +0100, Darryl Miles wrote:
>> But in response to your quip, it also part of the problem, I'm not going
>> to appoint legal council address this issue, its just not that important
>> to me.
>
> Funny you should use those words.
>
> Again, I'll say that it is vanishingly unlikely that you will be talking
> to a Red Hat lawyer so if you can't sign the Cygwin license agreement,
> you won't be getting code into Cygwin. There is no way to circumvent
> this requirement.
Yes I use those words just because I understand RHs position.
There is nothing to stop me publically maintaining a patch and patched
version of CYGWIN and source tree to build it as GPLed work.
There is little stopping someone coming along who will sign the
agreement from looking at my patch, getting the general idea and
implementing their own version of a similar thing and for that work to
be submitted.
Either way I have my fix and cygwin might have a usable submission.
You could also think of the situation differently, if RedHat were not
around (went bankrupt, ha ha, LOL). Then someone took over or setup a
cygwin website the first thing that would go would be the copyright
assignment agreement, since its a superfluous piece of documentation
that only served RedHat.
I have no idea how the law deals with non-existant copyright holders,
people dying or companies going bankrupt. The people issue maybe dealt
with as straightforward inheritance. But the incorporated company.
This maybe another reason why the FSF is a better bet, yes it is still
possible for a not-for-profit organization to go bankrupt but I'd hope
less likely and probably more amenable to accept donations from business
to restructure it should it get into difficulties (like I believe it to
have in the past).
Darryl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-15 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <006a01c6bfc5$29fb85d0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
2006-08-14 17:31 ` Darryl Miles
2006-08-14 17:54 ` Dave Korn
2006-08-14 18:02 ` Christopher Faylor
2006-08-15 9:24 ` Darryl Miles [this message]
2006-08-15 9:39 ` Corinna Vinschen
2006-08-15 9:59 ` Darryl Miles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44E18F20.3040700@netbauds.net \
--to=darryl-mailinglists@netbauds.net \
--cc=cygwin-licensing@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).