From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 77629 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2015 19:26:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-patches-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Archive: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-patches-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 77616 invoked by uid 89); 20 Oct 2015 19:26:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:26:02 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id CB8DEA807C9; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:25:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:26:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Subject: Re: New FAQ entry about permissions since Cygwin 1.7.34 Message-ID: <20151020192559.GC17374@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com References: <56143209.6060201@cornell.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z4+8/lEcDcG5Ke9S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56143209.6060201@cornell.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-q4/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 --z4+8/lEcDcG5Ke9S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 673 Hi Ken, On Oct 6 16:41, Ken Brown wrote: > There have been several recent threads on the cygwin list stemming from t= he > permissions change in 1.7.34. I've pointed people to the FAQ about ssh > public key authentication, which is not the first place where someone with > this problem is likely to look. The following patch attempts to remedy > this: Unfortunately it doesn't apply cleanly. There are weird differences in whitespaces and a patch-breaking line wrap. Can you check and resend, please? Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --z4+8/lEcDcG5Ke9S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWJpVHAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gPvwQAI4qTUgNi+S0Qb8vSJDRMAvW FA5zI5PQrzxOMMt2jrXhR8wINmcPBOZgW70Vnvpr6iEO+I7hYOh93WeK6KMTwNlV mfdarrw7gLZ8n/C2pOnE+UdrK1cCKTngr4d9zVpbIVktdxNzySrjEFDkmkmc34Bk 4TEWyZqvgWlcyEEFVu091rbl6Eg1GfjxXthYvigbmq8Y8pBc49/6ZHR5PLKJM/i6 LxDrLkm2C+5Ujwh/ez5OjRy2Z1b6VijFxbkJkGq5b1kmOcDMnWrjQuWsXAdD7vqg F4KLGzL+k7ArOXBDaLTEFixAe1XqJCNHW0NTsiFKzr9FW/hb127uX1ZCejFLAD4r swqAoW04kbjZVktuSN5JEKn3q4ovjN8o1AtkEUkIXgjmbgzbgpVZh3yeq67VHXNx wooqXC6l+tcwP9cH5oXoIq6XMYL4T6TX1Ts88mCbvNZ7zreGc4ObXsLKCZq9jYvq tNOEengCPk5BUFm/l07akj2/dA03JsCNCOpicU4ewpkD/n9XQo55zMESEc4gTD72 l0vfJACWEWO3hVdAWm4zuWHQ2Q4YPqhaFNe/hBxO4Oypoj2Ihlmto765sfj6mUi7 WjzuAtABMCRYJ+TZkgZbCpPHWrvErCbwagV8kH/hqbw80o+clE74lAIK0HkaNFz9 uEJcvuaFB8QNwZu6M2pB =l56N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z4+8/lEcDcG5Ke9S--