From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66009 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2015 08:24:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-patches-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Archive: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-patches-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 65919 invoked by uid 89); 21 Oct 2015 08:24:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:24:09 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 3D382A807CB; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:24:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:24:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Subject: Re: New FAQ entry about permissions since Cygwin 1.7.34 Message-ID: <20151021082407.GD17374@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com References: <56143209.6060201@cornell.edu> <20151020192559.GC17374@calimero.vinschen.de> <5626C4CC.3000603@cornell.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T7mxYSe680VjQnyC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5626C4CC.3000603@cornell.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-q4/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 877 On Oct 20 18:48, Ken Brown wrote: > On 10/20/2015 3:25 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Hi Ken, > > > >On Oct 6 16:41, Ken Brown wrote: > >>There have been several recent threads on the cygwin list stemming from= the > >>permissions change in 1.7.34. I've pointed people to the FAQ about ssh > >>public key authentication, which is not the first place where someone w= ith > >>this problem is likely to look. The following patch attempts to remedy > >>this: > > > >Unfortunately it doesn't apply cleanly. There are weird differences in > >whitespaces and a patch-breaking line wrap. Can you check and resend, > >please? >=20 > Sorry, my mailer must have messed it up. Here it is as an attachment. Thanks, applied. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWJ0unAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gIYoQAI1/PW6lhMcQ5zmhQG24WUIQ zvOPPUS8J1wjTJIIpHgQH0LOlB4nubkrX91p/QBFoo2jjx25OWPg0wu7xOP2wnHN exFWzsg/Qhg1aDJ8fzFUSyEYofZYDv1Fi3rbMnR/4d3jfN3/jRjSUle+VWKxp9Ij AizS/A2dRoIUa/7utwSRvb2uw3arhGS0ijVn68zlHHu4KFQWCtEu2ZAKcFCss+jr g4fRSYrmlV9B4xBk15YptzeIipp/de/v6IRChPPigOGA9pKGn/BQ6IzoqwMwYs1n mrkmRHg2EfanT6u6tZZdpTuKo+wS5DPCLPZ53U+NS/UrYXdCgkbz83JkYllEG/O3 luf/ALIWEW7uTjuOjGaHVSfYtJR0tRxDtr8H2yzOTVTgT5M8LorZBQjtRUQRsPwD 2x1kSaFDmKisl8hlTlL9KNAXVCl9BpLrZm1w6hyA/UzUQqj4cybMKH3YSr/d4ILU SohV6TKv9GJZyghZVfOsbUQHfxrC8UB0XvksTOfiHTbmFFYs3ny74ltTJqinKfZ7 wGJi7Uhlwqsn9RGwQ4Hp9nwVXu3n0jUgpkB8k81VGHcWcwry5Xv1XiqPxBQoIXHv EnZ5YEs/IMnD/JedAOBbWfzXaqtKexprsfk4X3QvNB9n7Tr4XDTKOX0ozFsqKJ79 YeQI4syXkRBrgb4tT5a4 =MxvL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC--