From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68783 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2016 19:26:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-patches-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Archive: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-patches-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 68676 invoked by uid 89); 21 Mar 2016 19:26:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*R:D*cygwin.com, HTo:U*cygwin-patches, H*Ad:U*cygwin-patches X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc0d020.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.208.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:25:53 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id E5BD1A803F7; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:25:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:26:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Update toplevel files from gcc Message-ID: <20160321192550.GE14892@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qOrJKOH36bD5yhNe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SW-Source: 2016-q1/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 --qOrJKOH36bD5yhNe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 823 On Mar 21 12:43, Peter Foley wrote: > When building a cross compiler targeting cygwin, the target objcopy > binary wasn't properly picked up. > It appears that a fix for this has been commited to the gcc tree > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=3Dgcc.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3Dfc740d700395d97b6719e= 8a0e64f75d01ab0d8fd >=20 > A patch to copy the updated Makefile.def, Makefile.tpl and > configure.ac from gcc and regenerate Makefile.in and configure is > 1.4M, so too large to send to the mailing list. >=20 > Would it be possible for someone to sync the latest toplevel files from g= cc? Yes, but that's time-consuming since there's no automatism. Give me a few days. Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --qOrJKOH36bD5yhNe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW8Eq+AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gkMQP/3oZHNquY1lqSSVe/K+Oxrsp FWHM9cazWNyp/4ZNcQYX+0i2wflq+zNa6z2eLqx1fdxqWzCMxEMMfprrO2TT+Kab JxyqlCMSFAbwS1iApQwIHzwS27kcRcj59ApHwnokSvX+ZVktOh9GZudIC6IKLAoD kI4IFb6h8rvaqM2Bs9dyCX21w6cl+tZ75j5hNS72gA1gzYQ7KiblAai0Xiq0aAJf dALkAi1X78q48WXUTjsio0wEwM0V0VfAc9mhg9xXx1tBqg8kILloVuI7UVkel6V1 AdM1JweQovjwUeqKmdmhHYP6CpdLQCEWWx0C2pF9BUUNK76yZFPA/oMMmtCGtEGK lQO3suJZUUlKycuz1mpGfecaC+mx6m4lZcizwoBbl5OMeNN4xbVWJo2uYTx25MY9 q7Ji41GWY9iSkViRfH9Qx7b0Yiatxz7k+kAYLebdnjsHjNS61F3uFqPVuQs7RRNP 3hawKgS7qXff+Tl5E9axGtyS8xdHBSX8OrvAX5xYE1aMfY/9RU9CzB0i2PGHun1g UPjmXbsuakOLYExNlvwXECInA8E14borLuVAfVA6p0+I2NITAEP55diwmDQrWzOJ fXajQ84qqfatVIl5E7OEB/6D4Lm8gMmatnr/w+mF8ZHx9iO6P2Bv8SaXH7d4c4O3 Ut4ERffglNaic+8tt1+Q =gCcA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qOrJKOH36bD5yhNe--