From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2934 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2013 07:40:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-patches-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Archive: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-patches-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 2923 invoked by uid 89); 16 Oct 2013 07:40:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pd0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-pd0-f170.google.com) (209.85.192.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:40:43 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so500376pdj.15 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 00:40:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.244.37 with SMTP id xd5mr1429110pbc.47.1381909240677; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 00:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (S0106000cf16f58b1.wp.shawcable.net. [24.79.212.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wp8sm89318309pbc.26.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 00:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <525E42FA.7040206@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:40:00 -0000 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Subject: Re: fix off-by-one in dup2 References: <52437121.1070507@redhat.com> <20131015140652.GA2098@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <525DA954.2040700@users.sourceforge.net> <20131015223433.GA7490@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20131015223433.GA7490@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-q4/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 On 2013-10-15 17:34, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:45:08PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> On 2013-10-15 09:06, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> Sorry for the delay in responding. I was investigating if setdtablesize >>> should set an errno on error but it is difficult to say if it should >>> since it seems not to be a POSIX or Linux. >> >> Did you see ? > > How does that help with setdtablesize? Never mind, it seems I misread your message. Yaakov