From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from re-prd-fep-046.btinternet.com (mailomta22-re.btinternet.com [213.120.69.115]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712733858C2B for ; Sun, 21 May 2023 20:32:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 712733858C2B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from re-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.54.4]) by re-prd-fep-046.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20230521203232.LIPR7994.re-prd-fep-046.btinternet.com@re-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net>; Sun, 21 May 2023 21:32:32 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 63F6BC5E0A36FB53 X-Originating-IP: [86.139.158.65] X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.139.158.65 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfeeiledgudeglecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvddtteffkeevveejgeehgeelhfdtgefgieelgffgudetudefvdeggfeiiefftdevnecukfhppeekiedrudefledrudehkedrieehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddurddutdeingdpihhnvghtpeekiedrudefledrudehkedrieehpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddprhgtphhtthhopeeurhhirghnrdfknhhglhhishesufhhrgifrdgtrgdprhgtphhtthhopegthihgfihinhdqphgrthgthhgvshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhmpdhrvghvkffrpehhohhsthekiedqudefledqudehkedqieehrdhrrghnghgvkeeiqddufeelrdgsthgtvghnthhrrghlphhluhhsrdgtohhmpdgruhhthhgpuhhsvghrpehjohhnthhurhhnvgihsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgv thdrtghomhdpghgvohfkrfepifeupdfovfetjfhoshhtpehrvgdqphhrugdqrhhgohhuthdqtddtud X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.106] (86.139.158.65) by re-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.814) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 63F6BC5E0A36FB53; Sun, 21 May 2023 21:32:32 +0100 Message-ID: <8818056b-6bc9-9e18-c5dd-a88a9106d535@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 21:32:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fhandler/proc.cc(format_proc_cpuinfo): Add Linux 6.3 cpuinfo Content-Language: en-GB To: Brian Inglis , Cygwin Patches References: <68bbf3607bdf37fcd32613aa962abe50846d968a.1682994011.git.Brian.Inglis@Shaw.ca> <0a50e9ad-59c8-65e9-95f5-f53843fbf918@dronecode.org.uk> <8e45602e-91c6-9621-1e70-4b1b3c400679@Shaw.ca> From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: <8e45602e-91c6-9621-1e70-4b1b3c400679@Shaw.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 12/05/2023 19:09, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2023-05-12 09:36, Jon Turney wrote: >> On 08/05/2023 04:12, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> cpuid    0x00000007:0 ecx:7 shstk Shadow Stack support & Windows >>> [20]20H1/[20]2004+ >>>             => user_shstk User mode program Shadow Stack support >>> AMD SVM  0x8000000a:0 edx:25 vnmi virtual Non-Maskable Interrrupts >>> Sync AMD 0x80000008:0 ebx flags across two output locations >> >> Thanks.  I applied this. >> >> Does this need applying to the 3.4 branch as well? > > How many users with the latest models will worry about this before 3.5 > release about October, and may Cygwin have support by then? I don't have the data to answer that question. Instead, I would ask what have we done for previous additions to /proc/cpuinfo ?