public inbox for cygwin-patches@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: spawn: Treat empty path as the current directory.
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 21:32:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab1226ff-1236-67a0-a140-0f6826fd1778@cornell.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220702083107.8aa64b1046484ab41911d8dc@nifty.ne.jp>

On 7/1/2022 7:31 PM, Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 21:16:35 -0400
> Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 6/30/2022 11:45 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
>>> On 6/27/2022 8:44 AM, Takashi Yano wrote:
>>>> - With this patch, the empty path (empty element in PATH or PATH is
>>>>     absent) is treated as the current directory as Linux does.
>>>> Addresses: https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2022-June/251730.html
>>>
>>> It might be a good idea to include a comment in the code and the commit message
>>> that this feature is being added for Linux compatibility but that it is
>>> deprecated.  According to https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/environ.7.html,
>>>
>>>                 As a legacy feature, a zero-length prefix (specified as
>>>                 two adjacent colons, or an initial or terminating colon)
>>>                 is interpreted to mean the current working directory.
>>>                 However, use of this feature is deprecated, and POSIX
>>>                 notes that a conforming application shall use an explicit
>>>                 pathname (e.g., .)  to specify the current working
>>>                 directory.
>>>
>>> Alternatively, maybe this is a case where we should prefer POSIX compliance to
>>> Linux compatibility.  Corinna, WDYT?
>>
>> I withdraw my suggestion.  There's already a comment in the code saying, "An
>> empty path or '.' means the current directory", so it's clear that the intention
>> was to support that feature, and the code was simply buggy.
>>
>> I've now read through the patch, and it looks good to me.  This was pretty
>> tricky to get right.
> 
> We still need to discuss whether it is better to align Linux
> behavior or just keeping POSIX compliance, don't we?

I interpreted the existing comment as meaning that a decision was already made 
at some point to align with Linux.  But it can't hurt to wait for Corinna to 
weigh in.

Ken

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-02  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-27 12:44 Takashi Yano
2022-06-30 15:45 ` Ken Brown
2022-06-30 18:35   ` [EXTERNAL] " Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
2022-06-30 19:03     ` Brian Inglis
2022-06-30 19:04     ` Takashi Yano
2022-07-01  1:16   ` Ken Brown
2022-07-01 23:31     ` Takashi Yano
2022-07-02  1:32       ` Ken Brown [this message]
2022-07-04  8:37         ` Corinna Vinschen
2022-07-04 23:05           ` Ken Brown
2022-07-05  4:54             ` Takashi Yano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ab1226ff-1236-67a0-a140-0f6826fd1778@cornell.edu \
    --to=kbrown@cornell.edu \
    --cc=cygwin-patches@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).