From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail231.csoft.net (mail231.csoft.net [96.47.74.235]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E54383B82C for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 18:52:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D9E54383B82C Received: from mail231.csoft.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail231.csoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1859DCB59 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:52:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail231 (mail231 [96.47.74.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jeremyd) by mail231.csoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13A27CB57 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:52:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:52:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeremy Drake X-X-Sender: jeremyd@resin.csoft.net To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Cygwin: respect PC_SYM_FOLLOW and PC_SYM_NOFOLLOW_REP with inner links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (BSO 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin core component patch submission and discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 18:52:06 -0000 On Mon, 31 May 2021, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > So we have two contradict problems, one which is solved by following > inner symlinks, one which is solved by not doing that... I hesitate to suggest it, but maybe an option/setting in the CYGWIN variable as to whether to use this new behavior? I am pretty much out of ideas on how to make it work with native programs where they expect to see the subst or mapped drive, not the target or UNC path. Then MSYS2 could either patch to change the default, or else just tell the (probably few) people who hit it how to change the setting.