From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 9.mo6.mail-out.ovh.net (9.mo6.mail-out.ovh.net [87.98.171.146]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5639F388C01A for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 17:18:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5639F388C01A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wijen.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ben@wijen.net Received: from player690.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.16.177]) by mo6.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58417237B5D for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:18:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from wijen.net (80-112-22-40.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [80.112.22.40]) (Authenticated sender: ben@wijen.net) by player690.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9A4E1A085021 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 17:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-97G002998464a7-bc8e-4b33-856e-c1dde6bba499, 1E059570D1A9E336F11081F47AF01A3014A153AE) smtp.auth=ben@wijen.net X-OVh-ClientIp: 80.112.22.40 Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] dir.cc: Try unlink_nt first From: Ben To: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches References: <20210115134534.13290-1-ben@wijen.net> <20210115134534.13290-12-ben@wijen.net> <20210118121343.GZ59030@calimero.vinschen.de> <1e7f1329-37bc-0e83-ed03-9d7f006acdde@wijen.net> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:18:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1e7f1329-37bc-0e83-ed03-9d7f006acdde@wijen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 14036031192281401092 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrtdekgddutddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepuffhvfhfkffffgggjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepuegvnhcuoegsvghnseifihhjvghnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevhfethfffveffhefgiedvkeevjeeiieetudejledukeeufeeifeehtdeifffggfenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpkedtrdduuddvrddvvddrgedtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpqdhouhhtpdhhvghlohepphhlrgihvghrieeltddrhhgrrdhovhhhrdhnvghtpdhinhgvtheptddrtddrtddrtddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsvghnseifihhjvghnrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnqdhprghttghhvghssegthihgfihinhdrtghomh X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin core component patch submission and discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 17:18:05 -0000 On 18-01-2021 18:07, Ben wrote: > > Have I missed something else? > Alright, I now see unlink uses isproc_dev and rmdir uses isdev_dev. Is this correct? Why are files and directories handled differently? Anyway, I will add isdev_dev to the new unlink_nt Ben...