From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from re-prd-fep-042.btinternet.com (mailomta22-re.btinternet.com [213.120.69.115]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1CB5385E02B for ; Sun, 29 May 2022 13:39:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F1CB5385E02B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from re-prd-rgout-004.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.54.7]) by re-prd-fep-042.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20220529133929.LEKF3291.re-prd-fep-042.btinternet.com@re-prd-rgout-004.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net> for ; Sun, 29 May 2022 14:39:29 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 613A901C25CB6E93 X-Originating-IP: [86.139.167.41] X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.139.167.41 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrkeeggdeihecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffekiefgudejheetudeigfejledtleegleetkeduteeftdfffefhueefgfeutedtnecukfhppeekiedrudefledrudeijedrgedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddurddutdehngdpihhnvghtpeekiedrudefledrudeijedrgedupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopegthihgfihinhdqphgrthgthhgvshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhm X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.105] (86.139.167.41) by re-prd-rgout-004.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.716.04) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 613A901C25CB6E93 for cygwin-patches@cygwin.com; Sun, 29 May 2022 14:39:29 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 14:39:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Cygwin: remove some 32-bit only path conversion functions Content-Language: en-GB To: Cygwin Patches References: <680ddbf2-db59-83ec-74dc-c3d04a2e6cf6@cornell.edu> From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: <680ddbf2-db59-83ec-74dc-c3d04a2e6cf6@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1194.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin core component patch submission and discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 13:39:33 -0000 On 26/05/2022 20:17, Ken Brown wrote: > Patch attached. If it were me writing this, perhaps I would add something in the cygwin API documentation near the modern replacements, saying "The obsolete functions XYZ only existed for x86 Cygwin and have been removed.". But perhaps that's not really worthwhile. I looked the rest of this patch set over and didn't see any problems.