From: Mark Geisert <mark@maxrnd.com>
To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: type mismatch on cpuset.h
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 00:09:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbc6009b-6aa0-69bd-e264-05e616f3721e@maxrnd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZAWqmGwaqbDtwNF8@calimero.vinschen.de>
[Redirected here from the main mailing list...]
Hi Corinna,
Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Mar 6 07:57, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> building latest gdal I noticed a type mismatch, that forced me to build
>> with "-fpermissive"
>>
>> on /usr/include/sys/cpuset.h
>>
>> #define CPU_ALLOC(num) __builtin_malloc (CPU_ALLOC_SIZE(num))
>>
>>
>> but on
>> https://linux.die.net/man/3/cpu_alloc
>>
>> cpu_set_t *CPU_ALLOC(int num_cpus)
>>
>>
>> so void* versus cpu_set_t*
>
> Marco is correct. cpuset.h was your pet project a while back. Would
> you like to pick it up? Maybe we should convert all the macros into
> type-safe inline functions, or macros calling type-safe (inline)
> functions, as on Linux as well as on BSD?
As far as I can tell from online docs, the CPU_SET(3) macros are still macros on
Linux, though they are documented with prototypes as if they were functions. I
don't immediately see a need to change our cpuset.h for this.
I'm also uncertain what exactly you mean by "type-safe" in this context. Could
you please give me an example for one of the macros?
I desk-checked all the macros vs their prototypes and I believe CPU_ALLOC that
Marco ran into is the only faulty one. It could be fixed with a cast. CPU_FREE's
result is void so I should make sure __builtin_free() corresponds.
CPU_ALLOC_SIZE's result is size_t and I believe the macro is correct as-is because
it is an expression using untyped integers and sizeof()s, the latter are
size_t-returning.
The other few macros that return results return int, and those are precisely the
ones whose inline code uses an int variable to accumulate a result.
If there is some other consideration I'm not seeing, e.g. readability, please let
me know. Otherwise I don't really see a need for changes here (modulo casting
return values properly where needed).
..mark
next parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-07 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <41f9bb68-d5e0-58d7-701f-a84b9db6b9a9@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <ZAWqmGwaqbDtwNF8@calimero.vinschen.de>
2023-03-07 8:09 ` Mark Geisert [this message]
2023-03-07 9:22 ` Corinna Vinschen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cbc6009b-6aa0-69bd-e264-05e616f3721e@maxrnd.com \
--to=mark@maxrnd.com \
--cc=cygwin-patches@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).