FW: PATCH: PR ld/4409: --unresolved-symbols=ignore-all issues on ia64

FW: PATCH: PR ld/4409: --unresolved-symbols=ignore-all issues on ia64

[Dave Korn]

  Shame there isn't a binutils-talk list, so I'll just have to say it here
instead....


On 03 July 2007 19:42, H.J. Lu wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:32:57AM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
>> 
>> On Jul 3, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> 
>>> "H.J. Lu" writes:
>>> 
>>>> Now the question is what linker should do when 2 exclusive options, like:
>>>> 
>>>> -shared, -Bshareable        Create a shared library
>>>> -pie, --pic-executable      Create a position independent executable
>>>> 
>>>> are given at the same time. Linker can issue an error or let the
>>>> last one wins. I am OK with either choice. What do people perfer?
>>>> Whatever we do, we should be consistent.
>>> 
>>> In gcc -shared wins over -pie.
>> 
>> And that's definitely what we should do.
> 
> Where is it documented. Gcc 4.3 just passes "-shared -pie" to
> linker. I don't see gcc driver remove -pie.
> 
> 
> H.J.


  This thread has been driving me mad for the past day or two, because I can't
read a single post from it without hearing Eric Cartman's voice in my head,
saying "No!  Bad kitteh!  You can't share my pie!  No shared pie!"



    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....