From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31724 invoked by alias); 26 May 2006 22:03:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 31710 invoked by uid 22791); 26 May 2006 22:03:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.powerc.net (HELO mail.powerc.net) (63.215.214.245) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 May 2006 22:02:33 +0000 Received: from WehrPC (unverified [70.238.110.130]) by mail.powerc.net (Vircom SMTPRS 4.3.459.0) with SMTP id for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 18:02:22 -0400 X-Modus-BlackList: bruce@wehrhere.com=OK From: "Bruce Wehr" To: "'The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List'" Subject: RE: No postnews or other Usenet news utilities? Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 22:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <002601c68110$94e0ad10$3100000a@microline.mtc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-reply-to: <001901c6806b$40372690$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00379.txt.bz2 Gary said: > I don't know what an "IAG" is. Is that a Pokemon? Nope. It's an acronym for one of my own personal catch phrases (which I got from Wes, one of my kids' friends): "It's All Good." I offered it up for potential inclusion in the OLOCA is an earlier post. > Because > if it is, David Korn will get angry. Don't make Dave > angry... You wouldn't like Dave when he's angry H'yah! But, don't worry - Dave made sure nobody else had to inform me of this no-so-little, unpleasant fact. :) My crisp, burnt flesh was still smoking when I left work that day. I imagine it must be like how you're gonna feel when you get to where you're finally going (i.e. Not Good). Dave's post wasn't flames; it was a friggin' blast furnace! (BTW, Dave: Do you prefer Dave, David or have no preference?) > Alas, I do. I am made all things to all men, that I might by > all means save some. Hmmm ... Sumpin's wrong with my tinkin' machine ... It's *still* unable to translate this statement's intended meaning and applicability. > No thanks, not if it involves Pokemons and/or spamming. Rest assured, it has nothing to do with Pokemons or spamming. > I never met a spammer who didn't claim to be. HEY! Am I being presumed guilty by reason of association here? BAD Gary! <>< Bruce